Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ratheesh Vs. Uthaman

Ratheesh vs Uthaman

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 01, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1095177

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ratheesh

Respondent

Uthaman

Excerpt

.....of 2013 (v) ------------------------------------------ appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits ------------------------------------- exhibit p1: atrue copy of the plaint in o.s.no.553/2009 of the munsiff's court, cherthala. exhibit p2: a true copy of the order in o.s.553/2009 dated2411.2011 of the principal munsiff's court, cherthala. exhibit p3: a true copy of the letter of the additional tahsildar dated161.2012. exhibit p4: a true copy of the certified copy of the filed sketch in sy.no.227/1 issued by the district survey superintendent, alappuzha dated132.2012. exhibit p5: a true copy of the letter of the assistant director, survey,(range)thrissur dated203.2012. exhibit p6: a true copy of the letter of the archivist dated66.2012. exhibit p7: a true copy of the letter dated116.2012 of the superintendent, central archivies. exhibit p8: atrue copy of the representation of the petitioner submitted before the3d respondent dated227.2013. exhibit p9: a true copy of the a.d.card dated237.2013. exhibit p10: a true copy of the judgment in w.p.(c)no.18233/2011 dated67.2011. respondent(s)' exhibits: nil /true copy/ p.a.to.judge sts p.r.ramachandra menon, j.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w.p.(c) no.23375 of2013- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dated this the 1st day of october, 2013 judgment the petitioner has approached this court with the following prayers : " i. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to dispose of ext.p8 application and prepare the plan within a time schedule to be fixed by this hon'ble court. ii. grant such other further reliefs which this hon'ble court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the case." 2. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the only relief sought for is to cause ext.p8 representation preferred by the petitioner to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.3. heard the learned government pleader as well.4. considering the limited extent of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY,THE1T DAY OF OCTOBER20139TH ASWINA, 1935 WP(C).No. 23375 of 2013 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- RATHEESH, MAKOM, PALLIPPURAM P.O, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. UTHAMAN, S/O.KUMARAN, MADATHIPARAMBU, PANAVALLY.P.O., CHERTHALA.PIN-688 531 2. VIJAYAMMA, W/O.UTHAMAN, -DO- -DO- 3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA, CHERTHALA P.O, PIN-688 524. R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0110-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C).No. 23375 of 2013 (V) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: ATRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.553/2009 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

IN O.S.553/2009 DATED2411.2011 OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHERTHALA. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR DATED161.2012. EXHIBIT P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FILED SKETCH IN SY.NO.227/1 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, ALAPPUZHA DATED132.2012. EXHIBIT P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SURVEY,(RANGE)THRISSUR DATED203.2012. EXHIBIT P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE ARCHIVIST DATED66.2012. EXHIBIT P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED116.2012 OF THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL ARCHIVIES. EXHIBIT P8: ATRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER SUBMITTED BEFORE THE3D RESPONDENT DATED227.2013. EXHIBIT P9: A TRUE COPY OF THE A.D.CARD DATED237.2013. EXHIBIT P10: A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

IN W.P.(C)NO.18233/2011 DATED67.2011. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c) No.23375 OF2013- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of October, 2013 JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers : " i. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to dispose of Ext.P8 application and prepare the plan within a time schedule to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Grant such other further reliefs which this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant under the circumstances of the case." 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the only relief sought for is to cause Ext.P8 representation preferred by the petitioner to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on merits. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P8 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after giving W.P.(C)No.23375/2013 2 an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at the earliest, at any rate within 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent for further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE sv. W.P.(C)No.23375/2013 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial