Sitaram Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sitaram Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 07, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1093352

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1093352
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 07, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sitaram Pathak

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....and district sagar, there are two survey numbers namely 80 and 133, which are government lands. the respondent nos.6 & 7 have encroached over these lands and have shown these lands in their proposed colony. it is submitted that in spite of representations made by the petitioner to respondent nos.2 to 5, no action has been taken in this regard till date. w.p.no.15954 of 2013 3. from the perusal of the record, we find that certain representations have been filed by the petitioner to respondent nos.2 to 5 and as per the petitioner, no action has been taken by them in this regard till date. 4. in view of the aforesaid, we dispose of this petition with the following direction:- (i) the petitioner to file a fresh representation to respondent no.3 agitating all his grievances, supported by necessary documents and a copy of this petition for ready reference of respondent no.3. (ii) the respondent no.3 on receipt of such complaint shall look into the grievances of the petitioner and shall take necessary action as required under the law expeditiously. no order as to costs. certified copy as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (subhash kakade) acting chief justice judge sj/-

Full Judgment

W.P.No.15954 of 2013 Sitaram Pathak vs The State of M.P.and others 07/10/2013 Shri Nitin Pandharkar and Shri P.K.Asati, Advocates for the petitioner.

Shri P.K.Kaurav, Additional Advocate General for the respondents/State.

The petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “(i) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record pertaining to the case from the Officer of the respondents No.1 to 5 and be further pleased to command the respondents to remove illegal constructions and illegal encroachment made by the respondents No.6 and 7 in violation of mandatory provisions and be further pleased to command the respondents No.1 to 5 to take suitable penal action against respondents No.6 and 7 to punish them for their illegal act, in the interest of justice.

(ii) Any other relief/order or directions which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper also be passed in favour of the petitioner, in the ends of justice.” 2.

The case of the petitioner is that at village Tillimafi, Tahsil and District Sagar, there are two survey numbers namely 80 and 133, which are Government lands.

The respondent Nos.6 & 7 have encroached over these lands and have shown these lands in their proposed colony.

It is submitted that in spite of representations made by the petitioner to respondent Nos.2 to 5, no action has been taken in this regard till date.

W.P.No.15954 of 2013 3.

From the perusal of the record, we find that certain representations have been filed by the petitioner to respondent Nos.2 to 5 and as per the petitioner, no action has been taken by them in this regard till date.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of this petition with the following direction:- (i) The petitioner to file a fresh representation to respondent No.3 agitating all his grievances, supported by necessary documents and a copy of this petition for ready reference of respondent No.3.

(ii) The respondent No.3 on receipt of such complaint shall look into the grievances of the petitioner and shall take necessary action as required under the law expeditiously.

No order as to costs.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Subhash Kakade) Acting Chief Justice Judge SJ/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Sitaram Pathak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition