Arpit Agrawal Vs. Anil Kumar and Another

Arpit Agrawal vs Anil Kumar and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Oct 04, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1090603

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1090603
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Oct 04, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arpit Agrawal

Respondent

Anil Kumar and Another

Excerpt

.....mr.justice ajay tewari *** present : mr.akshay bhan, advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. to be referred to the reporters or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?.ajay tewari, j. (oral) this petition has been filed under the contempt of courts act against the respondents for willfully violating the order dated 27.09.2013. this court by judgment and order dated 27.09.2013 passed in cwp no.17928 of 2013 had decided that there has been a mistake in the calculation of distribution of seats and as a result thereof the petitioner should be at serial no.1. however, despite having made representations (annexures p-3 & p-4) the same are not being decided. in my opinion, before taking recours.to the provisions of the contempt of courts act it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no.2 to decide the said representations by passing a speaking order thereon sharma ashish 2013.10.07 12:20 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh c.o.c.p.no.2617 of 2013 (o&m) -2- within any reasonable time. ordered accordingly. let the decision be taken on the said representations within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and, in case the petitioner is found entitled to the relief claimed the same be given to him within the aforesaid period. petition stands disposed of in the above terms.since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. a copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the court secretary. ( ajay tewari ) october 04, 2013 judge ashish sharma ashish 2013.10.07 12:20 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

C.O.C.P.No.2617 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P.No.2617 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.10.2013 Arpit Agrawal .....Petitioner versus Anil Kumar and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

*** 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?.

AJAY TEWARI, J.

(Oral) This petition has been filed under the Contempt of Courts Act against the respondents for willfully violating the order dated 27.09.2013.

This Court by judgment and order dated 27.09.2013 passed in CWP No.17928 of 2013 had decided that there has been a mistake in the calculation of distribution of seats and as a result thereof the petitioner should be at Serial No.1.

However, despite having made representations (Annexures P-3 & P-4) the same are not being decided.

In my opinion, before taking recouRs.to the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act it would be appropriate to direct the respondent No.2 to decide the said representations by passing a speaking order thereon Sharma Ashish 2013.10.07 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.O.C.P.No.2617 of 2013 (O&M) -2- within any reasonable time.

Ordered accordingly.

Let the decision be taken on the said representations within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and, in case the petitioner is found entitled to the relief claimed the same be given to him within the aforesaid period.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terMs.Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.

A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Court Secretary.

( AJAY TEWARI ) October 04, 2013 JUDGE ashish Sharma Ashish 2013.10.07 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties Arpit Agrawal vs Anil Kumar and Another Same Subject Land Acquisition