Jai Karan Vs. the Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act Sirsa Circle Sirsa and

Jai Karan vs The Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act Sirsa Circle Sirsa and

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Oct 04, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1090586

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1090586
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Oct 04, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jai Karan

Respondent

The Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act Sirsa Circle Sirsa and

Excerpt

in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh c.w.p.no.13196 of 2010 date of decision:-03.10.2013 jai karan .....petitioner versus the authority under the minimum wages act, sirs.circle, sirs.and others .....respondents coram :- hon'ble mr.justice satish kumar mittal. present:- mr.amandeep s. saini, advocate for the petitioner. mr.anjum ahmed, addl. ag haryana. mr.dheeraj narula, advocate for respondents no.2 to 5. **** satish kumar mittal, j.(oral) this writ petition has been filed by the employer challenging the order dated 18.12.2008 (annexure p-3).passed by the authority under the minimum wages act, 1948, sirs.circle, sirsa, whereby the petitioner has been ordered to pay an amount of rs.49,000/- to respondents no.2 to 5. in this case the respondents no.2 to 5 are the members of one family and their claim is that they were engaged as agriculture labourers by the petitioner who is an agriculturist. on the last date, both the parties have agreed that in case the petitioner pay rs.20,000/- to all the four respondents no.2 to 5 (rs.5000/- each) then their claim will be deemed to be considered as full and final settlement between them. in pursuance of the said saini reema 2013.10.07 12:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh c.w.p.no.13196 of 2010 -2- settlement, the petitioner has brought four drafts rs.5000/- each, in the name of all four respondents no.2 to 5 and the photostat copies of the said drafts have been taken on record. the original bank drafts have been handed over to counsel for respondents no.2 to 5. in view of the aforesaid settlement and payment, the entire claim of respondents no.2 to 5 against the petitioner stands satisfied. this petition is accordingly disposed of. ( satish kumar mittal) judge0310.2013 reema saini reema 2013.10.07 12:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.13196 of 2010 Date of Decision:-03.10.2013 Jai Karan .....Petitioner Versus The Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, SiRs.Circle, SiRs.and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.

Present:- Mr.Amandeep S.

Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Anjum Ahmed, Addl.

AG Haryana.

Mr.Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.

**** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral) This writ petition has been filed by the employer challenging the order dated 18.12.2008 (Annexure P-3).passed by the Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, SiRs.Circle, Sirsa, whereby the petitioner has been ordered to pay an amount of Rs.49,000/- to respondents No.2 to 5.

In this case the respondents No.2 to 5 are the members of one family and their claim is that they were engaged as agriculture labourers by the petitioner who is an agriculturist.

On the last date, both the parties have agreed that in case the petitioner pay Rs.20,000/- to all the four respondents No.2 to 5 (Rs.5000/- each) then their claim will be deemed to be considered as full and final settlement between them.

In pursuance of the said Saini Reema 2013.10.07 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.W.P.No.13196 of 2010 -2- settlement, the petitioner has brought four drafts Rs.5000/- each, in the name of all four respondents No.2 to 5 and the photostat copies of the said drafts have been taken on record.

The original bank drafts have been handed over to counsel for respondents No.2 to 5.

In view of the aforesaid settlement and payment, the entire claim of respondents No.2 to 5 against the petitioner stands satisfied.

This petition is accordingly disposed of.

( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE0310.2013 reema Saini Reema 2013.10.07 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties Jai Karan vs The Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act Sirsa ... Same Subject Education