***** Vs. State of Haryana and Others

CWP No.15507 of 2012 (7 cases) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** 1.

CWP No.15507 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.09.2013 ***** World Institute of Technology and others .

.Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** 2.

CWP No.15767 of 2012 (O&M) ***** Ganga Institute of Technology and Management and others .

.Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** 3.

CWP No.15545 of 2012 ***** Kalpana Chawla College of Engineering and Technology .

.Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** 4.

CWP No.16013 of 2012 (O&M) ***** International Institute of Technology .

.Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** CWP No.15507 of 2012 (7 cases) -2- 5.

CWP No.17416 of 2012 ***** Shivalik Polytechnic .

.Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** 6.

CWP No.22805 of 2012 (O&M) ***** S.D.Mewat Institute .

.Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** 7.

CWP No.19441 of 2012 (O&M) ***** B.M.Group of Institution .

.Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .

.

Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** In CWP No.15507 of 2012 Present: Mr.Arjun Partap Atma Ram, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr.Sandeep K.

Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the AICTE.

Mr.Munish Jolly, Advocate.

CWP No.15507 of 2012 (7 cases) -3- In CWP No.15767 of 2012 Present: Mr.Munish Jolly, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Vishal Sara, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr.Sandeep K.

Bhatnagar, Advocate, for Haryana State Counseling Society.

In CWP No.15545 of 2012 Present: Mr.Naveen Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Vishal Sara, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

In CWP No.16013 of 2012 Present: Mr.Manjeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Vishal Sara, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr.Sandeep K.

Bhatnagar, Advocate, for Haryana State Counseling Society.

In CWP No.17416 of 2012 Present: Mr.S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Vishal Sara, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr.Sandeep K.

Bhatnagar, Advocate, for Haryana State Counseling Society.

CWP No.15507 of 2012 (7 cases) -4- In CWP No.22805 of 2012 Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Vishal Sara, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr.Sandeep K.

Bhatnagar, Advocate, for Haryana State Counseling Society.

In CWP No.19441 of 2012 Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr.Rajiv Prashad, DAG, Haryana.

Mr.Vishal Sara, Advocate, for Mr.R.S.Kundu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

None for respondent No.3 ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.

(ORAL) This is a batch of seven cases bearing CWP Nos.15507, 15767, 15545, 16013, 17416, 22805 and 19441 of 2012.

Mr.R.S.Kundu appearing on behalf of the State Board of Technical Education, Haryana has submitted that these petitions have become infructuous because the petitioners have approached this Court for mandamus directing the respondents to grant affiliation to the colleges which has already been granted.

The statement made by counsel for the State Board of Technical Education, Haryana has been accepted by counsel for the petitioneRs.CWP No.15507 of 2012 (7 cases) -5- In view thereof, these writ petitions have rendered infructuous.

Disposed of as such.

(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 30.09.2013 JUDGE Vivek Pahwa Vivek 2013.10.04 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document