Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rambaran Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rambaran vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1089873

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rambaran

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.7997/2013 20/09/2013 shri siddharth datt, advocate for the applicant. shri c.k.mishra, ga for the respondent/state. heard finally. this is the second application filed by applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c for grant of bail. the firs.application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 29/11/12. applicant has been arrested on 28/03/12 in connection with crime no.67/12 registered at p.s.lavkush nagar, district chhatarpur for the offence punishable under sections 304-b, 498-a, 201 read with section 34 of ipc and section 3/ 4 of the dowry prohibition act. learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. it is further submitted that after dismissal of firs.application statement of maheshwardeen patel, father of deceased has been recorded. he was unable to depose the exact date of marriage of the deceased. he further admitted that gauna of her daughter/deceased was performed after three years of the marriage and she died after 3-4 years of her gauna thus, the deceased was died more than 7 years of the marriage. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the statement of maheshwardeen patel, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant rambaran shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.30,000/- (rs.thirty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of committal court/trial court, for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.7997/2013 20/09/2013 Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri C.K.Mishra, GA for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the second application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

The fiRs.application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 29/11/12.

Applicant has been arrested on 28/03/12 in connection with Crime No.67/12 registered at P.S.Lavkush Nagar, District Chhatarpur for the offence punishable under sections 304-B, 498-A, 201 read with section 34 of IPC and section 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

It is further submitted that after dismissal of fiRs.application statement of Maheshwardeen Patel, father of deceased has been recorded.

He was unable to depose the exact date of marriage of the deceased.

He further admitted that Gauna of her daughter/deceased was performed after three years of the marriage and she died after 3-4 years of her Gauna thus, the deceased was died more than 7 years of the marriage.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to be disposed of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case alongwith the statement of Maheshwardeen Patel, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail.

Therefore, without commenting on the merit of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant Rambaran shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Committal Court/trial Court, for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.SOLANKI) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial