Full Judgment
W.P.No.15107 / 2013 (Devendra Kumar Chaturvedi..Vs..State of M.P.& another) 20-09-2013 Shri Rajendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State/respondents.
Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.
The petitioner has filed this petition praying for rechecking of the answer sheets in the subject of Botany in the M.P.State Services Preliminary Examination, 2010, conducted by the M.P.Public Service Commission.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had previously approached this Court by filing W.P.No.15488/2011 wherein this Court, on the prayer of the petitioner, directed the respondent/authorities to supply the answer copies of the petitioner of the aforesaid examination.
It is submitted that pursuant to the directions issued by this Court the answer copies were supplied and thereafter the petitioner had filed W.P.(S)No.4528/2013 for revaluation.
This petition was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the authorities concerned for redressal of his grievance.
Subsequent thereto the petitioner had filed a representation before the authorities for revaluation of his answer sheets in the subject of Botany, but no action thereon has been taken by the concerned authority till today.
Hence, the petitioner has filed the present petition.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the record, it is seen that the petitioner had previously filed a petition for the same relief which he withdrew with liberty to approach the authority and that the matter is pending before the authority.
Even otherwise, the petitioner has not pointed out any provision for revaluation of the answer sheets of the preliminary examination.
In the absence of any provision for revaluation and specifically in view of the fact that more than three years have elapsed from the date on which the examination took place and thereafter the entire process of selection including holding of the main examination and interview are all over, therefore, I find no reason to entertain the present petition and issue directions for revaluation at the preliminary stage in the absence of any provision therefor.
In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner being meritless is accordingly dismissed.
( R.S.Jha ) Judge mct