Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narendra Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr

Narendra Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1086308

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narendra Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi c.m.p. no. 129 of 2013 narendra kumar .… petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & another .... respondents ­­­­­­­­­ coram: hon’ble the acting chief justice ­­­­­­­­­ for the petitioner : mr. p.k. mukhopadhyay, advocate for the state : j.c. to sr. s.c.­ii for respondent no. 2 : mr. indrajit sinha, advocate ­­­­­­­­­ 04/dated: 20 th september, 2013 1. this application has been preferred mainly for the reason that the order passed by this court in the cont. case (civil) no. 477 of 2010 especially what is stated in paragraph 4 thereof has not been paid to the petitioner. the rest 70% of legally payable amount was to be paid in one month and, thereafter, much time has been lapsed.2. learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submitted that the total amount payable was at rs. 5,72,366/­, out of which, 30% of amount has already been paid and, therefore, direction was given to make the payment of rest 70% of the aforesaid amount. it is also submitted by learned counsel for respondent no. 2 that let a month's time be granted to make the payment as per the order passed by this court in the cont. case (civil) no. 477 of 2010 and within the said period, rest 70% of the legally payable amount will be paid..3. if this amount is not paid on or before 21st november, 2013, such amount shall be paid with the cost of rs. 25,000/­.4. the matter is adjourned to be listed on 22nd november, 2013. (d.n. patel, a.c.j.) ajay/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 129 of 2013 Narendra Kumar .… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & another .... Respondents ­­­­­­­­­ CORAM: HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ­­­­­­­­­ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate For the State : J.C. to Sr. S.C.­II For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate ­­­­­­­­­ 04/Dated: 20 th September, 2013 1. This application has been preferred mainly for the reason that the order passed by this Court in the Cont. Case (Civil) No. 477 of 2010 especially what is stated in paragraph 4 thereof has not been paid to the petitioner. The rest 70% of legally payable amount was to be paid in one month and, thereafter, much time has been lapsed.

2. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submitted that the total amount payable was at Rs. 5,72,366/­, out of which, 30% of amount has already been paid and, therefore, direction was given to make the payment of rest 70% of the aforesaid amount. It is also submitted by learned counsel for respondent no. 2 that let a month's time be granted to make the payment as per the order passed by this Court in the Cont. Case (Civil) No. 477 of 2010 and within the said period, rest 70% of the legally payable amount will be paid..

3. If this amount is not paid on or before 21st November, 2013, such amount shall be paid with the cost of Rs. 25,000/­.

4. The matter is adjourned to be listed on 22nd November, 2013. (D.N. Patel, A.C.J.) Ajay/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial