Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ankit Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Ankit Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 21, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1086273

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ankit Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.7441 of 2013 ankit kumar singh @ ankit kumar sinha ............petitioner versus state of jharkhand …………….. ...............opposite party coram: hon’ble mr.justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner: mr.nilesh kumar for the state : a.p.p 2/ 21.9.13. heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the state. the petitioner is an accused in khelari p.s. case no.57 of 2013 registered under sections 366a/34 of the indian penal code. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has been alleged to have committed offence under section 366a of the indian penal code but according to the statement made by the victim girl, she had gone with the petitioner with her own accord and thereby the petitioner cannot be said to have enticed away the minor girl. regard being had to the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of judicial magistrate, 1st ranchi, in khelari p.s. case no.57 of 2013 (g.r.no.2720 of 2013). ( r. r. prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.7441 of 2013 Ankit Kumar Singh @ Ankit Kumar Sinha ............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand …………….. ...............Opposite Party CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Nilesh Kumar For the State : A.P.P 2/ 21.9.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Khelari P.S. case no.57 of 2013 registered under sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has been alleged to have committed offence under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code but according to the statement made by the victim girl, she had gone with the petitioner with her own accord and thereby the petitioner cannot be said to have enticed away the minor girl. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Ranchi, in Khelari P.S. case no.57 of 2013 (G.R.No.2720 of 2013). ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial