Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Warner-lambert Co. Vs. Kent

Warner-lambert Co. vs Kent

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-03-2008
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/108602

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
06-1498
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Warner-lambert Co.

Respondent

Kent

Excerpt

warner-lambert co. v. kent - 06-1498 (2008) warner-lambert co. v. kent - 06-1498 (2008) 552 u. s. ____ (2008) 552 u. s. ____ (2008) 552 u. s. ____ (2008) supreme court of the united states no. 06-1498 warner-lambert co., llc, et al., petitioners v. kimberly kent et al. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit [march 3, 2008]    per curiam.    the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court.    the chief justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Full Judgment

Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent - 06-1498 (2008)

Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent - 06-1498 (2008)

552 U. S. ____ (2008)
552 U. S. ____ (2008)
552 U. S. ____ (2008)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
NO. 06-1498

WARNER-LAMBERT CO., LLC, et al., PETITIONERS v. KIMBERLY KENT et al.

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit

[March 3, 2008]

   Per Curiam.

   The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

   The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial