Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hari Chand Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Hari Chand vs State of Raj. and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Sep 13, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085980

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hari Chand

Respondent

State of Raj. and ors

Excerpt

sbcwp no.8251/2012 - hari chand v/s state of rajasthan and ors. : judgment dtd.13.9.2013 1/2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur s.b. civil writ petition no.8251/2012 hari chand versus state of rajasthan and ors. present hon'ble dr.justice vineet kothari mr.c.s.kotwani, for the petitioner. mr.sandeep bhandawat, }for the respondents. mr.hemant chaudhary } date of order :13. h september, 2013 by the court (oral) 1. the learned counsels for the parties agree that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is covered by the decision of this court in the case of m/s r.p. bricks industries v/s state and ors. - sbcwp no.10833/2010 (along with 131 connected matters) decided on 26.4.2013. the operative portion of the said order reads as under : “from the above, this court is of the considered opinion that the present batch of writ petitions deserve dismissal and the challenge laid by the petitioners to the demand of conversion charges for use of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes by way of mining of brick sbcwp no.8251/2012 - hari chand v/s state of rajasthan and ors. : judgment dtd.13.9.2013 2/2 earth and manufacturing bricks in the brick kilns established by them on the agriculture land, whether in the colony area or other khatedari agricultural land cannot succeed and the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed and same are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.”2. accordingly, the present writ petition is also dismissed in same terms. no order as to costs. a copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned forthwith. (dr.vineet kothari)j.ss/- item no.30

Full Judgment

SBCWP NO.8251/2012 - HARI CHAND V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. : JUDGMENT

DTD.13.9.2013 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8251/2012 Hari Chand Versus State of Rajasthan and ors. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.C.S.Kotwani, for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Bhandawat, }for the respondents. Mr.Hemant Chaudhary } DATE OF ORDER

:

13. h September, 2013 BY THE COURT (ORAL) 1. The learned counsels for the parties agree that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of M/s R.P. Bricks Industries V/s State and ors. - SBCWP No.10833/2010 (along with 131 connected matters) decided on 26.4.2013. The operative portion of the said order reads as under : “From the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present batch of writ petitions deserve dismissal and the challenge laid by the petitioners to the demand of conversion charges for use of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes by way of mining of brick SBCWP NO.8251/2012 - HARI CHAND V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. : JUDGMENT

DTD.13.9.2013 2/2 earth and manufacturing bricks in the brick kilns established by them on the agriculture land, whether in the colony area or other khatedari agricultural land cannot succeed and the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed and same are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.”

2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also dismissed in same terms. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned forthwith. (Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J.

Ss/- item No.30

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial