Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B) No. 235 of 2013 Urmila Devi ….. Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Respondent ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT ----- For the Appellant - Mr. P.K.Pathak For the State - Mr. A.P.P ----- 7/16.9.2013 On receipt of the L.C.R, learned counsel for the appellant has pressed the appellant's prayer for suspension of her sentence, during pendency of this appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is the wife of the deceased; initially the case was instituted on the basis of her fard beyan against two named accused; subsequently, in course of investigation, the appellant along with other two co-accused, were roped in on the basis of the alleged confession of the appellant; except her confession before the police and the statement of PW-8 regarding her presence in the house along with other co-convicts before the occurrence took place, there is no other evidence to connect her with commission of the alleged crime; no incriminating article has been recovered from her possession. Learned A.P.P opposed the appellant's prayer for bail, but has not controverted the said contentions, which are based on record. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, during pendency of this appeal, the above named appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge - I, Bokaro in connection with S. T. No. 110/07 | S. T. No. 138/07. (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J) S.K (P. P. BHATT, J)