Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bablu Murmu Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Bablu Murmu vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 19, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085845

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bablu Murmu

Advocate Sri. S.P. Roy

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 8338 of 2013 … bablu murmu … petitioner -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand ... opposite party … coram: hon’ble mr. justice prashant kumar. … for the petitioner : - mr. s.p. roy, advocate for the state : - mr. v.k. tiwary, a.p.p. … 02/19.09.2013 bail application filed by bablu murmu, in connection with boarijore (lalmatiya) p.s. case no. 112 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 1191 of 2011 (s.t. no. 227 of 2012), pending in the court of district & additional sessions judge 1st, godda, is moved by sri s.p. roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri v.k. tiwary, learned additional p.p. for the state. earlier the bail prayer of petitioner rejected after considering the merit of the case. it appears that still the person, who identified this petitioner during t.i. parade, has not been examined. under the said circumstance, at this stage, i am not inclined to reconsider the bail prayer of petitioner. accordingly, bail prayer of petitioner rejected. however, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of witness, who identified him during t.i. parade. ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8338 of 2013 … Bablu Murmu … Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party … CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. … For the Petitioner : - Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the State : - Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P. … 02/19.09.2013 Bail application filed by Bablu Murmu, in connection with Boarijore (Lalmatiya) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 1191 of 2011 (S.T. No. 227 of 2012), pending in the court of District & Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Godda, is moved by Sri S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri V.K. Tiwary, learned Additional P.P. for the State. Earlier the bail prayer of petitioner rejected after considering the merit of the case. It appears that still the person, who identified this petitioner during T.I. Parade, has not been examined. Under the said circumstance, at this stage, I am not inclined to reconsider the bail prayer of petitioner. Accordingly, bail prayer of petitioner rejected. However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of witness, who identified him during T.I. Parade. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial