Krishan Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Krishan Prasad Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085797

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1085797
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Sep 17, 2013
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishan Prasad Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and being the executive engineer, he had advanced the amount to other officers, who are co-accused persons in this case, for execution of the works. those co-accused persons have been granted bail upon being found that the works had been executed by them or it was in process of the execution. learned counsel has accordingly, prayed for bail. learned counsel for the vigilance, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that there is allegation of defalcation of huge amount of government money against the petitioner and the amount advanced to the petitioner has not yet been adjusted. it is also submitted that the petitioner has since been dismissed from service. however, learned counsel upon going through the case diary, admits that construction works have either been done, or were in progress. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, krishan prasad singh, on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, koderma, in connection with koderma p.s. case no. 28 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. no. 113 of 2013. ( h. c. mishra, j.) r.kr.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6806 of 2013 Krishan Prasad Singh ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai & Ms. Soumya S. Pandey, Advocates For the Vigilance : Mr. T.N. Verma, A.P.P. -------- 2/ 17.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 379, 120(B) / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 28 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 113 of 2013. The petitioner was posted as an Executive Engineer, in NREP, Koderma, and there is allegation against him that in all Rs. 2,26,47,234.00 was advanced to him for execution of different works, but the said amount has not yet been adjusted. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and being the Executive Engineer, he had advanced the amount to other officers, who are co-accused persons in this case, for execution of the works. Those co-accused persons have been granted bail upon being found that the works had been executed by them or it was in process of the execution. Learned counsel has accordingly, prayed for bail. Learned counsel for the Vigilance, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail submitting that there is allegation of defalcation of huge amount of Government money against the petitioner and the amount advanced to the petitioner has not yet been adjusted. It is also submitted that the petitioner has since been dismissed from service. However, learned counsel upon going through the case diary, admits that construction works have either been done, or were in progress. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Krishan Prasad Singh, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma, in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 28 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 113 of 2013. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Krishan Prasad Singh vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal