Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suresh Prasad Vs. the Project Officer P B Area Putki Colliery Ms B C C L

Suresh Prasad vs The Project Officer P B Area Putki Colliery Ms B C C L

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085764

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh Prasad

Respondent

The Project Officer P B Area Putki Colliery Ms B C C L

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi w.p. (c) no. 342 of 2013 suresh prasad ... ... ... ... .... petitioner versus the project officer, p.b. area, putki colliery ... ... respondent coram: the hon’ble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. shekhar prasad sinha for the respondents : mr. ananda sen 6/17.09.2013 this application has been filed for quashing the order dated 31.08.2012 in misc. appeal no. 105 of 2012 passed by principal district judge, dhanbad, whereby and whereunder he dismissed the appeal of petitioner which was filed against the order of estate officer, putki, balihar area in eviction case no. 112 of 2011, whereby and whereunder he directed to evict petitioner from the land belonging to m/s bharat coking coal ltd. from perusal of impugned order, i find that appeal has been filed before principal district judge, dhanbad after expiry of period of limitation and no application filed for condonation of delay. thus, learned court below rightly dismissed the appeal being barred by limitation. under the said circumstance, i find no ground to interfere with the order of the learned appellate court. accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 342 of 2013 Suresh Prasad ... ... ... ... .... Petitioner Versus The Project Officer, P.B. Area, Putki Colliery ... ... Respondent CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen 6/17.09.2013 This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 31.08.2012 in Misc. Appeal No. 105 of 2012 passed by Principal District Judge, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder he dismissed the appeal of petitioner which was filed against the order of Estate Officer, Putki, Balihar Area in Eviction Case No. 112 of 2011, whereby and whereunder he directed to evict petitioner from the land belonging to M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. From perusal of impugned order, I find that appeal has been filed before Principal District Judge, Dhanbad after expiry of period of limitation and no application filed for condonation of delay. Thus, learned court below rightly dismissed the appeal being barred by limitation. Under the said circumstance, I find no ground to interfere with the order of the learned appellate court. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial