Satyabhama Devi Vs. Bccl

Satyabhama Devi vs Bccl

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 17, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085758

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1085758
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Sep 17, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satyabhama Devi

Respondent

Bccl

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi w.p. (c) no. 5451 o”1. satyabhama devi 2. binay kumar barnwal @ binay kumar .. ... ... petitioner versus 1. m/s b.c.c.l. dhanbad 2. project officer, putki balihar colliery ... ... ... respondents coram: the hon’ble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. shekhar prasad sinha for the respondents : mr. ananda sen 5/17.09.2013 this application has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.08.2012 in misc. appeal no. 141 of 2012 passed by principal district judge, dhanbad, whereby and whereunder he dismissed the appeal of petitioner which was filed against the order of estate officer, putki, balihar area in eviction case no. 236 of 2011, whereby and whereunder he directed to evict petitioner from the land belonging to m/s bharat coking coal ltd. from perusal of impugned order (annexure-1), i find that petitioner has filed appeal before principal district judge after period of limitation. it further appears that petitioner has not given any cogent reason for condonation of delay. under the said circumstance, i find no ground to interfere with the order of the learned appellate court. accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5451 o”

1. Satyabhama Devi 2. Binay Kumar Barnwal @ Binay Kumar .. ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. M/s B.C.C.L. Dhanbad 2. Project Officer, Putki Balihar Colliery ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen 5/17.09.2013 This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.08.2012 in Misc. Appeal No. 141 of 2012 passed by Principal District Judge, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder he dismissed the appeal of petitioner which was filed against the order of Estate Officer, Putki, Balihar Area in Eviction Case No. 236 of 2011, whereby and whereunder he directed to evict petitioner from the land belonging to M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. From perusal of impugned order (Annexure-1), I find that petitioner has filed appeal before Principal District Judge after period of limitation. It further appears that petitioner has not given any cogent reason for condonation of delay. Under the said circumstance, I find no ground to interfere with the order of the learned appellate court. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Satyabhama Devi vs Bccl Same Subject Education