Prashant Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Prashant Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 20, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085681

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1085681
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Sep 20, 2013
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prashant Kumar

Advocate Sri. Rajesh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 2415 of 2013 … prashant kumar … petitioner -v e r s u s- the state of jharkhand ... opposite party … coram: hon’ble mr. justice prashant kumar. … for the petitioner : - mr. rajesh kumar, advocate for the state : - mr. suchendra prasad, a.p .p. … 03/20.09.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by prashant kumar, in connection with tatisilway p.s. case no. 12 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. no. 779 of 2013, pending in the court of judicial magistrate, ranchi, is moved by sri rajesh kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri suchendra prasad, learned additional p.p. for the state. apart from other allegations, it is also alleged that petitioner had tried to commit rape upon the informant. thus, the case of petitioner is different from other co- accused, who were granted anticipatory bail by this court. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i am not inclined to enlarge petitioner on anticipatory bail. accordingly, anticipatory bail application of petitioner rejected. ( prashant kumar, j.) sunil/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2415 of 2013 … Prashant Kumar … Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party … CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. … For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Suchendra Prasad, A.P .P. … 03/20.09.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Prashant Kumar, in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 12 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 779 of 2013, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, is moved by Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Suchendra Prasad, learned Additional P.P. for the State. Apart from other allegations, it is also alleged that petitioner had tried to commit rape upon the informant. Thus, the case of petitioner is different from other co- accused, who were granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, anticipatory bail application of petitioner rejected. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Prashant Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal