Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ahilya Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand

Ahilya Devi vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085651

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ahilya Devi

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 7163 of 2013 ahilya devi …… petitioner versus the state of jharkhand …… opposite party --------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice amitav k. gupta --------- for the petitioner : mr. ranjeet kumar, advocate for the state : mr. shashi sekhar sahay, advocate --------- 02/dated:20. h september, 2013 the petitioner has been made accused for the offence registered under section 436/34 of the indian penal code. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated with sole intention to coerce the petitioner to compromise the case, lodged by her against the son of the informant and co-accused in mohanpur p.s. case no.175/2012, registered under sections 376(2)(g) of the indian penal code. it is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that co- accused, against whom similar allegation was made, has been granted bail by the learned court below. however, the petitioner's bail was rejected as earlier this high court had rejected a.b.a. no.859 of 2013 of the petitioner. learned a.p.p while opposing the bail of the petitioner, has not controverted the submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel. in the aforesaid facts and circumstance of the case the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of shri g. k. tiwary, learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, deoghar in connection with mohanpur p.s. case no.392 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 1514 of 2012. (amitav k. gupta, j.) chandan/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7163 of 2013 Ahilya Devi …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Sekhar Sahay, Advocate --------- 02/Dated:

20. h September, 2013 The petitioner has been made accused for the offence registered under Section 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated with sole intention to coerce the petitioner to compromise the case, lodged by her against the son of the informant and co-accused in Mohanpur P.S. Case No.175/2012, registered under Sections 376(2)(G) of the Indian Penal Code. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that co- accused, against whom similar allegation was made, has been granted bail by the learned Court below. However, the petitioner's bail was rejected as earlier this High Court had rejected A.B.A. No.859 of 2013 of the petitioner. Learned A.P.P while opposing the bail of the petitioner, has not controverted the submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel. In the aforesaid facts and circumstance of the case the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri G. K. Tiwary, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Deoghar in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.392 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1514 of 2012. (Amitav K. Gupta, J.) Chandan/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial