Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amresh Khaware and ors Vs. Subodh Kumar Jha and ors

Amresh Khaware and ors vs Subodh Kumar Jha and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Sep 18, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085590

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amresh Khaware and ors

Respondent

Subodh Kumar Jha and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi m. a no. 41 of 2011 amresh khaware & ors .... appellants versus subodh kumar jha ... respondents coram : hon’ble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay for the petitioner/ appellant (s): mr. k.p. deo for the opp. party/ respondents : xxx 18.09.2013 it appears that this appeal has been preferred under order xliii, rule 1(c) of the code of civil procedure, against the order dated 3.7.2010 passed by learned sub judge, deoghar, in misc case no. 06 of 2010, whereby he has refused to allow the petition filed by the appellants under order ix, rule 9 cpc. the office has indicated that in la reference brought before the special judge, land acquisition, the suit is valued at rs.13,915/- and, therefore, in view of the amendment in the bengal, agra & assam civil courts' (jharkhand amendment) act, 2002, pecuniary jurisdiction to hear the appeal below rs. 2,50,000/- ( rupees two lakhs and fifty thousand) has been given to the district judge. in view of the above, this appeal is not maintainable before this court and is, accordingly, dismissed. the memo of appeal may be handed over to the counsel for the appellants for presentation before the appropriate court having jurisdiction. ambastha/- ( d.n.upadhyay,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M. A No. 41 of 2011 Amresh Khaware & ors .... Appellants Versus Subodh Kumar Jha ... Respondents Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr. K.P. Deo For the opp. party/ respondents : xxx 18.09.2013 It appears that this appeal has been preferred under order XLIII, Rule 1(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order dated 3.7.2010 passed by learned Sub Judge, Deoghar, in Misc Case No. 06 of 2010, whereby he has refused to allow the petition filed by the appellants under Order IX, Rule 9 CPC. The office has indicated that in LA Reference brought before the Special Judge, Land Acquisition, the suit is valued at Rs.13,915/- and, therefore, in view of the amendment in the Bengal, Agra & Assam Civil Courts' (Jharkhand Amendment) Act, 2002, pecuniary jurisdiction to hear the appeal below Rs. 2,50,000/- ( rupees two lakhs and fifty thousand) has been given to the District Judge. In view of the above, this appeal is not maintainable before this Court and is, accordingly, dismissed. The memo of appeal may be handed over to the counsel for the appellants for presentation before the appropriate court having jurisdiction. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial