Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ltd and Vs. in the Matter of : M/S Vf Brands Indiare

Ltd and vs In the Matter of : M/S Vf Brands Indiare

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Sep 17, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1085492

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ltd and

Respondent

In the Matter of : M/S Vf Brands Indiare

Excerpt

order sheet cp no.399 of 2012 in the high court at calcutta original jurisdiction original side in the matter of : m/s seabird sales pvt.ltd -and - petitioner versus in the matter of : m/s vf brands india pvt.ltd.respondent before: the hon'ble justice biswanath somadder date :17. h september, 2013. for petitioner : mr.mr.mr.mr.s.b. saraf, advocate r. bhattacharya, advocate prithwiraj sinha, advocate ganesh n. jajodia, advocate the court : the registrar, original side is directed to intimate this court as to why the orders passed in the connected application, being ca no.258 of 2013, have not been placed along with the orders passed in the main petition, i.e.cp no.399 of 2012. perusing one of the orders passed in ca no.258 of 2013, it appears that harish tandon, j.on 24th june, 2013, has referred to an administrative order dated 18th may, 2007 and was of the view that the said application, being ca no.258 of 2013, could not be taken up by that bench since it was an application for recalling of an order dated 25th march, 2013 passed by sanjib banerjee, j. in the letter dated 2nd september, 2013,addressed to the registrar, high court of the original side, written by mr.anurag bagaria, being the learned advocate who represents tarani creations pvt.ltd., only the order dated 26th august, 2013, which was passed in cp no.399 of 2012, was annexed. issuing the order as such, the of assignment hon’ble, the chief justice, while had no occasion to consider the observations of harish tandon, j.as contained in the order dated 24th june, 2013, passed in ca no.258 of 2013. in such circumstances, let this matter be placed before the hon’ble the chief justice once again, for appropriate directions, along with the order dated 24th june, 2013, passed in ca no.258 of 2013. (biswanath somadder, j.)

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET CP No.399 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : M/S SEABIRD SALES PVT.LTD -AND - Petitioner Versus IN THE MATTER OF : M/S VF BRANDS INDIA PVT.LTD.Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date :

17. h September, 2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.S.B.

Saraf, Advocate R.

Bhattacharya, Advocate Prithwiraj Sinha, Advocate Ganesh N.

Jajodia, Advocate The Court : The Registrar, Original Side is directed to intimate this Court as to why the orders passed in the connected application, being CA No.258 of 2013, have not been placed along with the orders passed in the main petition, i.e.CP No.399 of 2012.

Perusing one of the orders passed in CA No.258 of 2013, it appears that Harish Tandon, J.on 24th June, 2013, has referred to an administrative order dated 18th May, 2007 and was of the view that the said application, being CA No.258 of 2013, could not be taken up by that Bench since it was an application for recalling of an order dated 25th March, 2013 passed by Sanjib Banerjee, J.

In the letter dated 2nd September, 2013,addressed to the Registrar, High Court of the Original Side, written by Mr.Anurag Bagaria, being the learned Advocate who represents Tarani Creations PVT.Ltd., only the order dated 26th August, 2013, which was passed in CP No.399 of 2012, was annexed.

issuing the order As such, the of assignment Hon’ble, the Chief Justice, while had no occasion to consider the observations of Harish Tandon, J.as contained in the order dated 24th June, 2013, passed in CA No.258 of 2013.

In such circumstances, let this matter be placed before the Hon’ble the Chief Justice once again, for appropriate directions, along with the order dated 24th June, 2013, passed in CA No.258 of 2013.

(BISWANATH SOMADDER, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial