Prato Vs. Vallas

Prato vs Vallas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-09-2003

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/108195

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/108195
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-09-2003
Case Number: 539 U.S. 1301
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prato

Respondent

Vallas

Excerpt

prato v. vallas - 539 u.s. 1301 (2003) october term, 2002 syllabus prato v. vallas et al. on application for extension of time no. 02ai042 (02-9753). decided june 9, 2003 petitioner's request for an extension of time to file a certiorari petition following this court's may 19, 2003, order denying her leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because there are no grounds upon which this court would grant certiorari. justice stevens, circuit justice. petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court on december 20, 2002. on may 19, 2003, over my unpublished dissent, the court issued an order denying petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis and giving petitioner until june 9, 2003, to pay the docketing fee required by rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with rule 33.1 of the rules of this court. petitioner now seeks an extension of time within which to comply with the may 19 order, explaining that she needs additional time to raise money to pay the docketing fee and printing costs. having reviewed petitioner's petition for a writ of certiorari, i am satisfied that there are no grounds upon which this court would grant certiorari, and i therefore deny petitioner's request for an extension of time.

Full Judgment

Prato v. Vallas - 539 U.S. 1301 (2003)

OCTOBER TERM, 2002

SYLLABUS

PRATO v. VALLAS ET AL.

ON APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME No. 02AI042 (02-9753). Decided June 9, 2003

Petitioner's request for an extension of time to file a certiorari petition following this Court's May 19, 2003, order denying her leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because there are no grounds upon which this Court would grant certiorari.

JUSTICE STEVENS, Circuit Justice.

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court on December 20, 2002. On May 19, 2003, over my unpublished dissent, the Court issued an order denying petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis and giving petitioner until June 9, 2003, to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Petitioner now seeks an extension of time within which to comply with the May 19 order, explaining that she needs additional time to raise money to pay the docketing fee and printing costs. Having reviewed petitioner's petition for a writ of certiorari, I am satisfied that there are no grounds upon which this Court would grant certiorari, and I therefore deny petitioner's request for an extension of time.

Same Court & Year US Supreme Court · 2003 Same Parties Prato vs Vallas Same Subject Education