Angoori Devi and Others Vs.

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Sep 09, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1071338

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1071338
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Sep 09, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Angoori Devi and Others

Excerpt

.....decision:09. 09.2013 angoori devi and others ....petitioners versus state of haryana and another ....respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice r.p.nagrath present: mr.sanjay verma, advocate for the petitioners.r.p.nagrath, j. (oral) this petition under section 482 cr.p.c.has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of fir no.429 dated 10.5.2013, registered under sections 498-a/323/506 ipc at police station sohna, district gurgaon. learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that after completion of investigation, challan has been filed before the trial court and the court is yet to hear on the question of charge. learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that petitioners no.2 and 5, namely, shashi @ sasia and maya, respectively, are the married sisters of kali charan-husband of the complainant-geeta and petitioner no.1 angoori devi, is the mother-in-law of the complainant and is a 70 years kartaria rishu 2013.09.10 16:58 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crm-m-29813-2013 -2- old lady. after arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioners no.1, 2 and 5 to move appropriate application before the trial court for seeking exemption from their personal appearance. dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. if the trial court decides to frame charge, petitioners no.1, 2 and 5 shall keep on putting appearance till the charge is framed. however, for the subsequent dates their personal appearance shall be exempted on furnishing the following undertakings:- (i) that their advocate shall appear on their behalf on each and every date of hearing and the evidence recorded in their absence would be acceptable to them; (ii) the undertaking of their counsel to appear on each date of hearing to defend their case; (iii) that they will not dispute their identity and will appear in person before the trial court as and when directed by the.....

Full Judgment

CRM-M-29813-2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29813-2013 Date of decision:

09. 09.2013 Angoori Devi and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE R.P.NAGRATH PRESENT: Mr.Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the petitioneRs.R.P.NAGRATH, J.

(ORAL) This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.429 dated 10.5.2013, registered under Sections 498-A/323/506 IPC at Police Station Sohna, District Gurgaon.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that after completion of investigation, challan has been filed before the trial Court and the Court is yet to hear on the question of charge.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that petitioners No.2 and 5, namely, Shashi @ Sasia and Maya, respectively, are the married sisters of Kali Charan-husband of the complainant-Geeta and petitioner No.1 Angoori Devi, is the mother-in-law of the complainant and is a 70 years Kartaria Rishu 2013.09.10 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29813-2013 -2- old lady.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioners No.1, 2 and 5 to move appropriate application before the trial Court for seeking exemption from their personal appearance.

Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

If the trial Court decides to frame charge, petitioners No.1, 2 and 5 shall keep on putting appearance till the charge is framed.

However, for the subsequent dates their personal appearance shall be exempted on furnishing the following undertakings:- (i) that their advocate shall appear on their behalf on each and every date of hearing and the evidence recorded in their absence would be acceptable to them; (ii) the undertaking of their counsel to appear on each date of hearing to defend their case; (iii) that they will not dispute their identity and will appear in person before the trial Court as and when directed by the trial Court.

September 09, 2013 ( R.P.NAGRATH ) rishu JUDGE Kartaria Rishu 2013.09.10 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties Angoori Devi and Others vs Same Subject Land Acquisition