Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Date of Decision: 17.5.2013 Vs. Inderjit Singh

Date of Decision: 17.5.2013 vs inderjit Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 17, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1069364

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Family

Key legal issue
Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Date of Decision: 17.5.2013

Respondent

inderjit Singh

Excerpt

.....the petitioner has filed two proceedings namely (i) petition under the domestic violence act and (ii) petition for maintenance, which are pending at ludhiana. it is further stated that the suit for injunction filed by the husband seeking to restrain the wife from taking the custody of their daughter has already been transferred to ludhiana vide order dated 5.4.2013 passed by this court. t.a.no.106 of 2013 (o&m) #2# it is further stated that the respondent husband filed a petition under section 13 of the act which, as noticed above, is pending in the court of learned addl. district judge, ferozepur. it is averred that the petitioner wife is a house wife, has no source of income and is fully dependent upon her parents while the respondent is not paying even a single penny for the upkeep and maintenance of petitioner wife and in these circumstances, it is difficult for the petitioner to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent husband at ferozepur, which is about 140 kms away from ludhiana. after hearing learned counsel for the parties, i find that the grounds set out in the petition are sufficient to allow the petition as it is well settled that in matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against wife, convenience of wife must be looked at. reliance in this regard can be placed upon sumita singh v. kumar sanjay and another, air 200.sc 396. in view of the above, the present petition is allowed, the petition under section 13 of the act, titled inderjit singh versus goldy from the court of learned addl. district judge, ferozepur is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the district courts, ludhiana for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal. may 17, 2013 ( jaswant singh ) manot judge

Full Judgment

T.A.No.106 of 2013 (O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A.No.106 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:

17. 5.2013 Goldy .....Petitioner(s) Versus Inderjit Singh ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.J.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Nimanyu Gautam, Advocate for the respondent.

JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner wife has filed the present transfer application under Section 24 CPC for the transfer of petition filed by respondent husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 (for short “the Act”.) , titled Inderjit Singh versus Goldy from the Court of learned Addl.

District Judge, Ferozepur to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ludhiana.

It is stated that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 11.5.1997 at Kotkapura and out of their wedlock, a girl child was born on 23.6.2002, who is stated to be residing with the respondent-husband.

Due to dowry demand, it is alleged that the petitioner was turned out of the matrimonial home at Ferozepur.

Petitioner is stated to be residing separately at her parental home at Ludhiana.

It is stated that the petitioner has filed two proceedings namely (i) petition under the Domestic Violence Act and (ii) petition for maintenance, which are pending at Ludhiana.

It is further stated that the suit for injunction filed by the husband seeking to restrain the wife from taking the custody of their daughter has already been transferred to Ludhiana vide order dated 5.4.2013 passed by this Court.

T.A.No.106 of 2013 (O&M) #2# It is further stated that the respondent husband filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act which, as noticed above, is pending in the Court of learned Addl.

District Judge, Ferozepur.

It is averred that the petitioner wife is a house wife, has no source of income and is fully dependent upon her parents while the respondent is not paying even a single penny for the upkeep and maintenance of petitioner wife and in these circumstances, it is difficult for the petitioner to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent husband at Ferozepur, which is about 140 kms away from Ludhiana.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find that the grounds set out in the petition are sufficient to allow the petition as it is well settled that in matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against wife, convenience of wife must be looked at.

Reliance in this regard can be placed upon Sumita Singh v.

Kumar Sanjay and another, AIR 200.SC 396.

In view of the above, the present petition is allowed, the petition under Section 13 of the Act, titled Inderjit Singh versus Goldy from the Court of learned Addl.

District Judge, Ferozepur is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the District Courts, Ludhiana for disposal in accordance with law from the stage of withdrawal.

May 17, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manot JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial