Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dial Chand Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Dial Chand vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Apr 12, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1069141

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dial Chand

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

in the punjab and haryana high court at chandigarh cwp no.8136 of 2013 date of decision:12. 04.2013 dial chand ………petitioner versus state of punjab & others ………… respondents ***** coram : hon’ble mr.justice augustine george masih present:- mr.a.p.s.rehan, advocate for the petitioner. ***** augustine george masih, j.(oral) heard. the petitioner has filed the present petition for issuing directions to the respondents for counting their previous service rendered in the punjab state handloom & textile development corporation limited (puntex) towards his pensionary and other retiral benefits. counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim as raised in the present writ petition is clearly covered by a decision of division bench of this court dated 24.03.2009 passed in lpa no.44 of 2006 titled as state of punjab and others versus subhash chander chadha and another (annexure p-2).counsel submits that even a legal notice dated 01.03.2013 (annexure p-4) towards his claim has been preferred by the petitioner and the same is still pending consideration. in the light of the averments made in the petition and the submissions raised by the counsel for the petitioner, i deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent/authorities to cwp no.8136 o”2. consider and decide the legal notice dated 01.03.2013 (annexure p-4) in terms of passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. suffice it to observe that the authorities, while taking a decision in the matter, shall keep in mind the decision of this court dated 24.03.2009 passed in lpa no.44 of 2006 titled as state of punjab and others versus subhash chander chadha and another (annexure p-2).decision so taken be conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. the present petition is disposed of accordingly. 12.04.2013 (augustine george masih) 'sp' judge

Full Judgment

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8136 of 2013 Date of Decision:

12. 04.2013 Dial Chand ………Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ………… Respondents ***** CORAM : HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present:- Mr.A.P.S.Rehan, Advocate for the petitioner.

***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(ORAL) Heard.

The petitioner has filed the present petition for issuing directions to the respondents for counting their previous service rendered in the Punjab State Handloom & Textile Development Corporation Limited (PUNTEX) towards his pensionary and other retiral benefits.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim as raised in the present writ petition is clearly covered by a decision of Division Bench of this Court dated 24.03.2009 passed in LPA No.44 of 2006 titled as State of Punjab and others versus Subhash Chander Chadha and another (Annexure P-2).Counsel submits that even a legal notice dated 01.03.2013 (Annexure P-4) towards his claim has been preferred by the petitioner and the same is still pending consideration.

In the light of the averments made in the petition and the submissions raised by the counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent/authorities to CWP No.8136 o”

2. consider and decide the legal notice dated 01.03.2013 (Annexure P-4) in terms of passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Suffice it to observe that the authorities, while taking a decision in the matter, shall keep in mind the decision of this Court dated 24.03.2009 passed in LPA No.44 of 2006 titled as State of Punjab and others versus Subhash Chander Chadha and another (Annexure P-2).Decision so taken be conveyed to the petitioner forthwith.

The present petition is disposed of accordingly.

12.04.2013 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) 'sp' JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial