Full Judgment
-1- Civil Revision No.4588 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4588 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision:
02. 08.2013 Ranbir Kaur ....Petitioner Versus St.
Soldier Properties and Industries Limited and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
2) To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.
3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?.
Present: - Mr.Mandeep Singh Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioner.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J.
(ORAL) Instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 21.5.2013 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division).Jalandhar, whereby the evidence of petitioner has been closed by order of the court.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that affidavits of the witnesses are already on record and they are only to be cross- examined by defendant No.2.
Although, two opportunities have been granted, since the affidavits are already on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, this Court is of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be met if the petitioner is given one Singh Ravinder 2013.08.05 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh -2- Civil Revision No.4588 of 2013 opportunity to lead evidence.
For the reasons stated above, present revision is allowed and order dated 21.5.2013 is set aside.
Petitioner is granted one opportunity to lead the evidence at her own risk and responsibility subject to costs quantified at ` 10,000/-, to be paid by the petitioner to respondent.
Witnesses of the plaintiff/petitioner shall be examined/cross-examined on the same day before the evidence of the defence witnesses.
This revision has been allowed without notice to the respondents with a view to avoid delay and expense in view of the nature of the order that has been passed.
Liberty is granted to the respondents to move this court if they are aggrieved against the order.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge August 02, 2013 R.S.Singh Ravinder 2013.08.05 12:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh