Dalwinder Singh and Others Vs. Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and Another

Dalwinder Singh and Others vs Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Aug 26, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1066571

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1066571
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Aug 26, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dalwinder Singh and Others

Respondent

Authority Under the Minimum Wages Act and Another

Excerpt

.....decision:26.08.2013 dalwinder singh and others ...petitioner(s) versus authority under the minimum wages act and another ...respondent(s) coram: hon'ble mr.justice rameshwar singh malik 1 to be referred to the reporters or no.?.”2. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. present: none for the parties.rameshwar singh malik, j. (oral) feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioners have approached this court by way of instant writ petition under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus. petitioners claim the similar relief as allegedly granted to similar employee, namely, jagtar singh vide annexure p-1 passed by respondent no.1. however, petitioners have not placed on record any representation made to the competent authority or any legal notice, raising their demand before filing the present writ petition. in view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority by raising their grievance by way of an appropriate representation, at the firs.instance. it saluja mukesh kumar 2013.08.27 11:52 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.6397 o”2. is further directed that if the petitioners approach the competent authority raising their grievance by way of legal notice or representation within a period of three months from today, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same at an early date, by passing an appropriate order, in accordance with law but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation or legal notice from the petitioners.disposed of, accordingly. 26.08.2013 (rameshwar singh malik) mks judge

Full Judgment

Saluja Mukesh Kumar 2013.08.27 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP NO.6397 o”

1. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.6397 of 2012 Date of decision:26.08.2013 Dalwinder Singh and others ...Petitioner(s) Versus Authority under the Minimum Wages Act and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK 1

To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.”

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?.

Present: None for the parties.

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.

(Oral) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioners have approached this Court by way of instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus.

Petitioners claim the similar relief as allegedly granted to similar employee, namely, Jagtar Singh vide Annexure P-1 passed by respondent No.1.

However, petitioners have not placed on record any representation made to the competent authority or any legal notice, raising their demand before filing the present writ petition.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority by raising their grievance by way of an appropriate representation, at the fiRs.instance.

It Saluja Mukesh Kumar 2013.08.27 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP NO.6397 o”

2. is further directed that if the petitioners approach the competent authority raising their grievance by way of legal notice or representation within a period of three months from today, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same at an early date, by passing an appropriate order, in accordance with law but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation or legal notice from the petitioneRs.Disposed of, accordingly.

26.08.2013 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) mks JUDGE

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties Dalwinder Singh and Others vs Authority Under the Minimum Wag... Same Subject Land Acquisition