Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gurinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Gurinder Singh vs State of Punjab and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Sep 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1065666

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gurinder Singh

Respondent

State of Punjab and Another

Excerpt

crm not m-26183 of 2013 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh (245) crm not m-26183 of 2013 date of decision:20. 09.2013. gurinder singh ......petitioner versus state of punjab and another .......respondents coram: hon'ble mrs.justice sabina present: mr.g.s.sandhu, advocate for the petitioner. mr.gazi mohd. dag, punjab. mr.ravindra jain, advocate for respondent no.2. **** sabina, j. petitioner has filed this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the fir no.51 dated 26.05.2005 under sections 323, 324, 148 and 149 of the indian penal code, 1860 registered at police station goraya, district jalandhar and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. at the time of issuance of notice of motion, following order was passed on 16.08.2013:- “learned counsel for the petitioner has sandeep sethi 2013.09.21 11:59 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crm not m-26183 of 2013 -2- submitted that it is a case of version and cross version. parties have amicably settled their dispute and due to this reason, petitioner did not appear before the trial court. the absence of the petitioner before the trial court was not intentional. notice of motion for 20.09.2013. in the meantime, petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court and the trial court shall release the petitioner on interim bail, subject to its satisfaction.” learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance to the above order, petitioner has surrendered before the trial court on 06.09.2013 and has furnished interim bail. accordingly, the interim bail furnished by the petitioner before the trial court in terms of the order 16.08.2013 is made absolute. petition stands disposed of accordingly. (sabina) judge september 20, 2013. sandeep sethi sandeep sethi 2013.09.21 11:59 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

CRM not M-26183 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (245) CRM not M-26183 of 2013 Date of decision:

20. 09.2013.

Gurinder Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Gazi Mohd.

DAG, Punjab.

Mr.Ravindra Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** SABINA, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR No.51 dated 26.05.2005 under Sections 323, 324, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Goraya, District Jalandhar and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

At the time of issuance of notice of motion, following order was passed on 16.08.2013:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has Sandeep Sethi 2013.09.21 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM not M-26183 of 2013 -2- submitted that it is a case of version and cross version.

Parties have amicably settled their dispute and due to this reason, petitioner did not appear before the trial court.

The absence of the petitioner before the trial court was not intentional.

Notice of motion for 20.09.2013.

In the meantime, petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court and the trial court shall release the petitioner on interim bail, subject to its satisfaction.”

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance to the above order, petitioner has surrendered before the Trial Court on 06.09.2013 and has furnished interim bail.

Accordingly, the interim bail furnished by the petitioner before the Trial Court in terms of the order 16.08.2013 is made absolute.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

(SABINA) JUDGE September 20, 2013.

sandeep sethi Sandeep Sethi 2013.09.21 11:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial