Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Merchant

United States vs Merchant

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-24-1987
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/106449

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
480 U.S. 615
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Merchant

Excerpt

united states v. merchant - 480 u.s. 615 (1987) u.s. supreme court united states v. merchant, 480 u.s. 615 (1987) 480 u.s. 615 united states v. merchant certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit no. 85-1672. argued march 4, 1987 decided march 24, 1987 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 760 f.2d 963 . paul j. larkin, jr., argued the cause for the united states. with him on the briefs were solicitor general fried, assistant attorney general trott, and deputy solicitor general bryson. penelope m. cooper argued the cause for respondent. with her on the brief were cristina c. arguedas and ted w. cassman. * per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. [ footnote * ] nancy gertner and judith h. mizner filed a brief for the american civil liberties union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. page 480 u.s. 615, 616

Full Judgment

UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT - 480 U.S. 615 (1987)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT, 480 U.S. 615 (1987) 480 U.S. 615

UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 85-1672.

Argued March 4, 1987
Decided March 24, 1987

Paul J. Larkin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Trott, and Deputy Solicitor General Bryson.

Penelope M. Cooper argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Cristina C. Arguedas and Ted W. Cassman. *

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

[ Footnote * ] Nancy Gertner and Judith H. Mizner filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

Page 480 U.S. 615, 616



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial