Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vermont Vs. Cox

Vermont vs Cox

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-14-1987
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/106328

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
484 U.S. 173
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vermont

Respondent

Cox

Excerpt

vermont v. cox - 484 u.s. 173 (1987) u.s. supreme court vermont v. cox, 484 u.s. 173 (1987) 484 u.s. 173 vermont v. cox certiorari to the supreme court of vermont no. 86-1108. argued november 3, 1987 decided december 14, 1987 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 147 vt. 421, 519 a. 2d 1144. susan r. harritt, assistant attorney general of vermont, argued the cause for petitioner. with her on the briefs were jeffrey l. amestoy, attorney general, and joanna a. mauer, assistant attorney general. paul j. larkin, jr., argued the cause for the united states as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. on the brief were solicitor general fried, assistant attorney general weld, deputy solicitor general bryson, harriet s. shapiro, and kathleen a. felton. henry hinton, by invitation of the court, 481 u.s. 1012, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support of the judgment below. with him on the brief was william a. nelson. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 484 u.s. 173, 174

Full Judgment

VERMONT v. COX - 484 U.S. 173 (1987)
U.S. Supreme Court VERMONT v. COX, 484 U.S. 173 (1987) 484 U.S. 173

VERMONT v. COX
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT

No. 86-1108.

Argued November 3, 1987
Decided December 14, 1987

Certiorari dismissed.

Reported below: 147 Vt. 421, 519 A. 2d 1144.

Susan R. Harritt, Assistant Attorney General of Vermont, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Attorney General.

Paul J. Larkin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. On the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Weld, Deputy Solicitor General Bryson, Harriet S. Shapiro, and Kathleen A. Felton.

Henry Hinton, by invitation of the Court, 481 U.S. 1012, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support of the judgment below. With him on the brief was William A. Nelson.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 484 U.S. 173, 174



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial