. Vs. Sri Sakti Prosad Misra and anr... Respondents/

. vs Sri Sakti Prosad Misra and anr... Respondents/

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 02, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1061647

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1061647
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: Tapen Sen
Decided On: Mar 02, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Respondent

Sri Sakti Prosad Misra and anr... Respondents/

Excerpt

.....concerned, it should have been given for the whole of the howrah municipal corporation area and it could not have been limited to central howrah, baruipara, bankra, ichapur and baltikuri under the howrah municipal corporation. he refers to page-54 of the contempt application in support of his contention that the hon’ble division bench interpreted sl.no.62 howrah as ‘howrah municipal corporation area’. under these circumstances, he submits that the order has not been complied with till date. both mr.sakti prasad mishra, senior regional manager and mr.s.chakraborty, deputy general manager, lpf (s&m) are present in court pursuant to the rule issued. they have been explained the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in court and they have prayed for some time to apply their mind. let the matter be listed under the same heading on 16th march, 2012 when they will be personally present,again. the order/letter/communication dated 27th february, 2012 along with a map attached thereto is taken on record. all parties concerned are to act on a photostat signed copy of the minutes of this order on the usual undertakings. (tapen sen, j.) km

Full Judgment

1 ORDER

SHEET C.C.No.9 of 2012 W.P.No.1245 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction Contempt ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.CALCUTTA LANDING & SHIPPING Co.LTD ..Petitioner .

Versus Sr.SAKTI PROSAD MISr.& ANR.Respondents/Contemners BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE TAPEN SEN Date :

2. d March, 2012.

Mr.D.Saha Roy, Advocate, Mr.Pingal Bhattacharjee, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr.Sarajit Roy Choudhury, Advocate for the Respondents The Court : In this contempt application, while Mr.Sarajit Roychoudhury states that the order has not been complied with in view of the grant of the letter of appointment dated 27th February, 2012, Mr.Debabrata Saha Roy, referring to paragraph-3 of the said letter, submits that his trading area has been curtailed in complete defiance of the judgment of this Court and which was confirmed in appeal.

He submits that so far as Sl.No.62 in the notice for appointment of LPG Distributorship was concerned, it should have been given for the whole of the Howrah Municipal Corporation area and it could not have been limited to Central Howrah, Baruipara, Bankra, Ichapur and Baltikuri under the Howrah Municipal Corporation.

He refers to Page-54 of the contempt application in support of his contention that the Hon’ble Division Bench interpreted Sl.No.62 Howrah as ‘Howrah Municipal Corporation area’.

Under these circumstances, he submits that the order has not been complied with till date.

Both Mr.Sakti Prasad Mishra, Senior Regional Manager and Mr.S.Chakraborty, Deputy General Manager, LPF (S&M) are present in Court pursuant to the Rule issued.

They have been explained the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Court and they have prayed for some time to apply their mind.

Let the matter be listed under the same heading on 16th March, 2012 when they will be personally present,again.

The order/letter/communication dated 27th February, 2012 along with a map attached thereto is taken on record.

All parties concerned are to act on a photostat signed copy of the minutes of this order on the usual undertakings.

(TAPEN SEN, J.) km

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2012 Same Parties . vs Sri Sakti Prosad Misra and anr... Respondents/ Same Subject Education Same Judge Tapen Sen