Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ors.Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 13, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1060936

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1060936
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
Decided On: Mar 13, 2013
Subject: Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Company

Key legal issue: Company

Parties & Advocates

Respondent

Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ors.Respondent

Excerpt

.....kr. banerjee, g.p.with mr.biswajit mukherjee & mr.debangshu mondal, adversus g.a.no.514 of 2013 : this application has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in this application, we are of the opinion that sufficient reasons have been shown for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. therefore, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. let the appeal be registered, if otherwise in form. thus, the application stands allowed. there will be no order as to costs. g.a.no.562 of 2013 : having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that the issues raised in the appeal should be decided expeditiously and no interim order should be passed at this stage. the appellants herein are, therefore, directed to prepare requisite number of informal paper books out of court and file the same within one week from date. since the contesting parties are represented by the concerned learned advocates, requirement of service of notice of appeal and all other formalities stand dispensed with. however, an index shall be prepared by the appellants and included in the paper books to be filed. let the appeal be listed under the heading ‘for hearing’ two weeks hence before the appropriate bench. all parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings. (pranab kumar chattopadhyay, j.) (murari prasad shrivastava, j.) k. banerjee a.r.[c.r.].

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET A.P.O.T.No.79 of 2013 G.A.No.514 of 2013 G.A.No.562 of 2013 With W.P.No.1420 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BAGRESS CEREALS PVT.LTD.& ANR.

Versus CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.Appellants/Petitioners Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY -AndThe Hon'ble JUSTICE MURARI PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA Date :

13. h March, 2013.

For Appellants/Petitioners : Mr.Kishore Dutta with Mr.Hiranmaya Bhattacharya & Mr.Emon Bhattacharya, Adversus For Respondents : Mr.Ashoke Kr.

Banerjee, G.P.with Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee & Mr.Debangshu Mondal, Adversus G.A.No.514 of 2013 : This application has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.

Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and considering the averments made in this application, we are of the opinion that sufficient reasons have been shown for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.

Therefore, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

Let the appeal be registered, if otherwise in form.

Thus, the application stands allowed.

There will be no order as to costs.

G.A.No.562 of 2013 : Having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that the issues raised in the appeal should be decided expeditiously and no interim order should be passed at this stage.

The appellants herein are, therefore, directed to prepare requisite number of informal paper books out of Court and file the same within one week from date.

Since the contesting parties are represented by the concerned learned Advocates, requirement of service of notice of appeal and all other formalities stand dispensed with.

However, an index shall be prepared by the appellants and included in the paper books to be filed.

Let the appeal be listed under the heading ‘For Hearing’ two weeks hence before the appropriate Bench.

All parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.) (MURARI PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA, J.) K.

Banerjee A.R.[C.R.].

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2013 Same Parties vs Calcutta Municipal Corporation and ors.Respondent Same Subject Company Same Judge Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay