Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suresh Kumar Banani and ors. Vs. Ramgopal Banani and ors.

Suresh Kumar Banani and ors. vs Ramgopal Banani and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Dec 17, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1060436

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh Kumar Banani and ors.

Respondent

Ramgopal Banani and ors.

Excerpt

ga no.176 of 2012 ga no.2502 of 2012 cs no.321 of 2011 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction suresh kumar banani & ors.versus ramgopal banani & ors.before: the hon’ble justice i.p.mukerj.date:17. h december 2012 appearance: mr.s.n. mitra, sr.advocate mr.d.basak, advocate mr.j.gharai, advocate for the plaintiffs mr.abhrajit mitra, advocate for defendant no.1 mr.jishnu choudhury, advocate for defendant. no.25 it is submitted on behalf of mr.santosh benani, the defendant no.25 that he is entirely dependent on the rental income for survival and for that he is in need of some funds to make payments for some medical expenses. it further appears that some more time is needed for compliance with the order dated 6th december 2012. i direct the parties and the receiver to forthwith comply with this order. furthermore, i direct the receiver to make payment of rs.30,000/- out of the funds collected to the defendant no.25, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the other parties. it is made clear that if it is found subsequently that there was no ground as taken above, for receiving the money, the defendant no.25 would be obliged to refund this amount to the receiver. the the receiver rental may occupation appropriate charges 300 collected gms by per month him as from his remuneration. the receiver will also be entitled to appoint a clerk at a remuneration of rs.500 per month. the clerk’s remuneration will also come out of the funds collected as above. the receiver shall file his report by 18th january 2013. affidavits-in-opposition in both the applications be filed by 17th january 2013. list these applications on 30th january 2013. affidavits-in-reply may be filed in the meantime. receiver and all parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings. (i.p.mukerji, j.) r. bose ar(cr)

Full Judgment

GA No.176 of 2012 GA No.2502 of 2012 CS No.321 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Suresh Kumar Banani & ORS.Versus Ramgopal Banani & ORS.Before: The Hon’ble Justice I.P.MUKERJ.Date:

17. h December 2012 Appearance: Mr.S.N.

Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.D.Basak, Advocate Mr.J.Gharai, Advocate for the plaintiffs Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Advocate for defendant No.1 Mr.Jishnu Choudhury, Advocate for defendant.

No.25 It is submitted on behalf of Mr.Santosh Benani, the defendant No.25 that he is entirely dependent on the rental income for survival and for that he is in need of some funds to make payments for some medical expenses.

It further appears that some more time is needed for compliance with the order dated 6th December 2012.

I direct the parties and the Receiver to forthwith comply with this order.

Furthermore, I direct the Receiver to make payment of Rs.30,000/- out of the funds collected to the defendant No.25, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the other parties.

It is made clear that if it is found subsequently that there was no ground as taken above, for receiving the money, the defendant No.25 would be obliged to refund this amount to the Receiver.

The the Receiver rental may occupation appropriate charges 300 collected Gms by per month him as from his remuneration.

The Receiver will also be entitled to appoint a clerk at a remuneration of Rs.500 per month.

The clerk’s remuneration will also come out of the funds collected as above.

The Receiver shall file his report by 18th January 2013.

Affidavits-in-opposition in both the applications be filed by 17th January 2013.

List these applications on 30th January 2013.

Affidavits-in-reply may be filed in the meantime.

Receiver and all parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(I.P.MUKERJI, J.) R.

Bose AR(CR)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial