Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fugate Vs. New Mexico

Fugate vs New Mexico

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-26-1985
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105961

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
470 U.S. 904
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fugate

Respondent

New Mexico

Excerpt

fugate v. new mexico - 470 u.s. 904 (1985) u.s. supreme court fugate v. new mexico, 470 u.s. 904 (1985) 470 u.s. 904 fugate v. new mexico certiorari to the supreme court of new mexico no. 83-6663. argued february 19, 1985 decided march 26, 1985 101 n. m. 58, 678 p.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided court. j. thomas sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs was henry r. quintero. paul bardacke, attorney general of new mexico, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the briefs was anthony tupler, assistant attorney general. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice powell took no part in the decision of this case. page 470 u.s. 904, 1

Full Judgment

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO - 470 U.S. 904 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO, 470 U.S. 904 (1985) 470 U.S. 904

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

No. 83-6663.

Argued February 19, 1985
Decided March 26, 1985

101 N. M. 58, 678 P.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

J. Thomas Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Henry R. Quintero.

Paul Bardacke, Attorney General of New Mexico, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Anthony Tupler, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 470 U.S. 904, 1



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial