Vs. the Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 22, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1059593

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1059593
Court: Kolkata High Court
Judge: Soumitra Pal
Decided On: Feb 22, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Respondent

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and ors

Excerpt

.....in court today be kept on record. this writ petition has been filed challenging the intimation dated 29th december, 2011 issued by the manager (administration).haldia dock complex, kolkata port trust, the respondent no.4, on the ground that though by an order dated 22nd december, 2010 direction was issued to communicate the decision to the petitioner it has not been done as evident from the impugned intimation. mr.talukder, learned senior advocate for the kolkata port trust submits that since it is evident from the intimation dated 29th december, 2011 that decision has been communicated, therefore, the order under challenge is just and proper. having heard the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the deputy chairman, board of trustees for the kolkata port trust, haldia dock complex, purba medinipur, respondent no.3 to furnish a copy of the order passed by him to the petitioner within a week from date from the date of communication of this order. i make it clear that i have not into the merits with regard to other points raised in this writ petition. since the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission without calling upon the respondents to file affidavits controverting the allegations, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by them. no order as to costs. urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the appearing parties on priority basis. (soumitra pal, j.) ssaha ar(cr)

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET W.P.No.98 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.FAIR DEAL SUPPLIES LTD Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Versus THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF KOLKATA & ORS …………………………………………………………….Defendant/Respondent For Plaintiff/Petitioner : MR.L.C.BIHANI,SR.ADVOCATE, MS.NOELLE BANERJEE,ADVOCATE, MR.D.DEY,ADVOCATE.

For Defendant/Respondent : MR.S.TALUKDER,SR.ADVOCATE, MR.S.GHOSH,ADVOCATE.

BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date :

22. d February, 2012.

The Court : Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept on record.

This writ petition has been filed challenging the intimation dated 29th December, 2011 issued by the Manager (Administration).Haldia Dock Complex, Kolkata Port Trust, the respondent no.4, on the ground that though by an order dated 22nd December, 2010 direction was issued to communicate the decision to the petitioner it has not been done as evident from the impugned intimation.

Mr.Talukder, learned senior advocate for the Kolkata Port Trust submits that since it is evident from the intimation dated 29th December, 2011 that decision has been communicated, therefore, the order under challenge is just and proper.

Having heard the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the Deputy Chairman, Board of Trustees for the Kolkata Port Trust, Haldia Dock Complex, Purba Medinipur, respondent no.3 to furnish a copy of the order passed by him to the petitioner within a week from date from the date of communication of this order.

I make it clear that I have not into the merits with regard to other points raised in this writ petition.

Since the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission without calling upon the respondents to file affidavits controverting the allegations, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by them.

No order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the appearing parties on priority basis.

(SOUMITRA PAL, J.) ssaha AR(CR)

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2012 Same Parties vs The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata and ors Same Subject Education Same Judge Soumitra Pal