Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jensen, Vs. Quaring

Jensen, vs Quaring

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1985
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105902

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
472 U.S. 478
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Company

Key legal issue
Company

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jensen,

Respondent

Quaring

Excerpt

jensen, v. quaring - 472 u.s. 478 (1985) u.s. supreme court jensen, v. quaring, 472 u.s. 478 (1985) 472 u.s. 478 jensen, director, department of motor vehicles of nebraska, et al. v. quaring certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eight circuit no. 83-1944. argued january 7, 1985 decided june 17, 1985 728 f.2d 1121 , affirmed by an equally divided court. ruth anne e. galter, assistant attorney general of nebraska, argued the cause for petitioners. with her on the brief was paul l. douglas, attorney general. thomas c. lansworth argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were burt neuborne and charles s. sims. * [ footnote * ] marc d. stern and ronald a. krauss filed a brief for the american jewish congress et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. solicitor general lee, deputy solicitor general geller, and kathryn a. oberly filed a brief for the united states as amicus curiae. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice powell took no part in the decision of this case. page 472 u.s. 478, 479

Full Judgment

JENSEN, v. QUARING - 472 U.S. 478 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court JENSEN, v. QUARING, 472 U.S. 478 (1985) 472 U.S. 478

JENSEN, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF NEBRASKA, ET AL.
v. QUARING
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHT CIRCUIT
No. 83-1944.

Argued January 7, 1985
Decided June 17, 1985

728 F.2d 1121 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Ruth Anne E. Galter, Assistant Attorney General of Nebraska, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief was Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General.

Thomas C. Lansworth argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Burt Neuborne and Charles S. Sims. *

[ Footnote * ] Marc D. Stern and Ronald A. Krauss filed a brief for the American Jewish Congress et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

Solicitor General Lee, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, and Kathryn A. Oberly filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 472 U.S. 478, 479



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial