Koehler Vs. Engle

Koehler vs Engle

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-26-1984

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105727

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/105727
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Mar-26-1984
Case Number: 466 U.S. 1
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Koehler

Respondent

Engle

Excerpt

koehler v. engle - 466 u.s. 1 (1984) u.s. supreme court koehler v. engle, 466 u.s. 1 (1984) 466 u.s. 1 koehler, warden v. engle certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit no. 83-1. argued february 28, 1984 decided march 26, 1984 707 f.2d 241 , affirmed by an equally divided court. louis j. caruso, solicitor general of michigan, argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the brief were frank j. kelley, attorney general, and thomas c. nelson, assistant attorney general. john nussbaumer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice marshall took no part in the decision of this case. page 466 u.s. 1, 2

Full Judgment

KOEHLER v. ENGLE - 466 U.S. 1 (1984)
U.S. Supreme Court KOEHLER v. ENGLE, 466 U.S. 1 (1984) 466 U.S. 1

KOEHLER, WARDEN v. ENGLE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

No. 83-1.

Argued February 28, 1984
Decided March 26, 1984

707 F.2d 241 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General of Michigan, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, and Thomas C. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General.

John Nussbaumer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 466 U.S. 1, 2

Same Court & Year US Supreme Court · 1984 Same Parties Koehler vs Engle Same Subject Land Acquisition