Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.60 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:
1. 8.2013 Parkash Chand ......Appellant(s) Versus Nirvail Singh & ors......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: None for the appellant.
Ms.Neha Jain, Advocate for Mr.K.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the respondents.
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.
(Oral) On July 02, 2012, it was noticed that the sole appellant in this appeal had died.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the aforesaid appellant had sought time to implead his legal heiRs.Thereafter, on 1.10.2012, none appeared on behalf of the appellant and the following order was passed by this Court: “There is written request for adjournment by counsel for appellant being out of station, with 'no objection' from the opposite counsel.
However, order of the preceding date has not been complied with.
In the interest of justice, one last opportunity is granted for doing the needful.
Adjourned to 13.02.2013.
Necessary steps for impleading LRs of appellant, since deceased, be also taken in the meanwhile.”
Saini Pushpinder 2013.08.02 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Rs.No.60 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Again on 13.2.2013, on the request made on behalf of the counsel for the appellant-Prakash Chand (since deceased).this Court had adjourned the case for today to enable him to bring on record the legal representatives of sole appellant.
Thus, it may be seen that in spite of the fact that the counsel, who was representing appellant-Prakash Chand (since deceased).had already been granted one year's time to bring on record the LRs.yet no one has come on the file to pursue this appeal.
It seems that the appellants are not interested in pursuing their remedy.
Appeal is dismissed having been abated.
August 01, 2013 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE Saini Pushpinder 2013.08.02 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh