Mohan Devi and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Mohan Devi and Another vs State of Haryana and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Aug 01, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1055398

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1055398
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Aug 01, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohan Devi and Another

Respondent

State of Haryana and Others

Excerpt

in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.16621 of 2013 date of decision :01. 08.2013 mohan devi and another ...petitioners versus state of haryana and others ....respondents coram :- hon'ble mr.justice satish kumar mittal hon'ble mr.justice mahavir s. chauhan present: mr.sudhanshu makkar, advocate, for the petitioners.*** satish kumar mittal, j. ( oral ) the petitioners have filed the instant petition for issuing direction to the respondents to allot them plot under the oustees category. it is the case of the petitioners that their land measurin”1. 3 marla (400 square yards) situated in village hansi, hadbast no.119, tehsil hansi, district hisar, was acquired vide notification dated 12.6.1995, for residential, commercial, industrial and transportation related purpose. it is the further case of the petitioners that in spite of the requests made by them, the respondents did not consider their claim for allotment of plot under the oustee policy of the state government. in this regard, the petitioners served legal notice dated 11.4.2013, copy of which is available on record as annexure p-16, to respondents no.2 and 3 as well as to the estate officer, dass narotam 2013.08.02 12:24 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.16621 of 2013 -2- huda, hisar, but till date the same has not been considered and decided. after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners.without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the estate officer, huda, hisar to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice dated 11.4.2013 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. ( satish kumar mittal ) judge august 01, 2013 ( mahavir s. chauhan ) ndj judge dass narotam 2013.08.02 12:24 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16621 of 2013 DATE OF DECISION :

01. 08.2013 Mohan Devi and another ...PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE MAHAVIR S.

CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.*** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.

( Oral ) The petitioners have filed the instant petition for issuing direction to the respondents to allot them plot under the oustees category.

It is the case of the petitioners that their land measurin”

1. 3 marla (400 square yards) situated in village Hansi, Hadbast No.119, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar, was acquired vide notification dated 12.6.1995, for residential, commercial, industrial and transportation related purpose.

It is the further case of the petitioners that in spite of the requests made by them, the respondents did not consider their claim for allotment of plot under the oustee policy of the State Government.

In this regard, the petitioners served legal notice dated 11.4.2013, copy of which is available on record as Annexure P-16, to respondents No.2 and 3 as well as to the Estate Officer, Dass Narotam 2013.08.02 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.16621 of 2013 -2- HUDA, Hisar, but till date the same has not been considered and decided.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioneRs.without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the Estate Officer, HUDA, Hisar to consider and decide the aforesaid legal notice dated 11.4.2013 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months.

( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE August 01, 2013 ( MAHAVIR S.

CHAUHAN ) ndj JUDGE Dass Narotam 2013.08.02 12:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties Mohan Devi and Another vs State of Haryana and Others Same Subject Land Acquisition