Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohinder Kaur and Others Vs. V.

Mohinder Kaur and Others vs V.

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Aug 13, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1055030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohinder Kaur and Others

Respondent

V.

Excerpt

.....of gpf was released only on 17.3.2012. in the written statement, the delay has been attributed to the fact that `payment was made after complete correspondence with the higher authorities.' in my considered opinion, this cannot be a ground for delaying the payment of gpf, which otherwise becomes liable for payment on the kumar kishan 2013.08.14 10:34 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh c.w.p no.25076 of 2012 (o&m) ::2:: last date of service of an employee. rule 13.13(1) of the punjab civil service rules (vol.ii) lays down to the following effect :- “13.13(1) subject to the provisions of clause (5) below, government shall pay to the credit to the account of the subscriber interest at such rate as may be determined for each year according to the method of calculation prescribed from time to time by the competent authority.” the above said provision, thus, unequivocally entitles the employees for interest on gpf amount at the rate fixed by the government from time to time. resultantly, this writ petition is allowed. the respondents are directed to pay to the petitioner interest on delayed payment of gpf from 1.4.2011 to 16.3.2012 at the rate which was determined for the financial year 2011-2012. let necessary payment be made within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. it is made clear that in case, payment is not made within the aforesaid period, the petitioners would be entitled to further interest @ 8% pa w.e.f 16.3.2012 till the date of payment. no order as to costs. ( ajay tewari ) august 13, 2013. judge `kk' kumar kishan 2013.08.14 10:34 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh

Full Judgment

C.W.P No.25076 of 2012 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.25076 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : August 13, 2013 Mohinder Kaur and otheRs......Petitioners v.

State of Punjab and otheRs......Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.H.S Baath, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Monika Chhibber, DAG Punjab *** 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.”

2. To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.”

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?.

*** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Prayer in this writ petition is for grant of interest on delayed release of GPF amount.

Counsel for the petitioners has argued that the husband of petitioner No.1 retired from service on 31.3.2011 and the amount of GPF was released only on 17.3.2012.

In the written statement, the delay has been attributed to the fact that `payment was made after complete correspondence with the higher authorities.' In my considered opinion, this cannot be a ground for delaying the payment of GPF, which otherwise becomes liable for payment on the Kumar Kishan 2013.08.14 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh C.W.P No.25076 of 2012 (O&M) ::2:: last date of service of an employee.

Rule 13.13(1) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules (Vol.II) lays down to the following effect :- “13.13(1) Subject to the provisions of clause (5) below, Government shall pay to the credit to the account of the subscriber interest at such rate as may be determined for each year according to the method of calculation prescribed from time to time by the competent authority.”

The above said provision, thus, unequivocally entitles the employees for interest on GPF amount at the rate fixed by the government from time to time.

Resultantly, this writ petition is allowed.

The respondents are directed to pay to the petitioner interest on delayed payment of GPF from 1.4.2011 to 16.3.2012 at the rate which was determined for the financial year 2011-2012.

Let necessary payment be made within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

It is made clear that in case, payment is not made within the aforesaid period, the petitioners would be entitled to further interest @ 8% pa w.e.f 16.3.2012 till the date of payment.

No order as to costs.

( AJAY TEWARI ) August 13, 2013.

JUDGE `kk' Kumar Kishan 2013.08.14 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial