Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Amar Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054557

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amar Singh

Advocate Shri. Gopal Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1....w.a.no.1329 of 2012 amar singh state of m.p.& other 19.12.2012 shri gopal singh, counsel for the appellant. shri vivek agrawal, g.a.for the respondents. this appeal is directed against an order dated 31.10.2012, by which a writ petition preferred by the petitioner against the rejection of the representation filed by the appellant in compliance of earlier order passed by the writ court, was dismissed. it was a second round of litigation. though learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is suffering from brain tumor and he is entitled to remain posted at his present place of posting but once the representation for ventilation of the grievances has been rejected by the competent authority, no further action is required. in earlier round of litigation, the writ court had not interfered in the transfer order but permitted the appellant to file representation before the competent authority. not the competent authority has considered the representation and rejected the same and thereafter the order was challenged in the writ petition which has been dismissed in the impugned order. in the impugned order, we do not find any error warranting our interference. the petitioner after his joining at the transferred place may submit a fresh representation for his adjustment to a nearer place to rewa to get his treatment properly. in case of filing of such representation, the competent authority would consider the matter in accordance with law. with the aforesaid liberty, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge vj

Full Judgment

1....W.A.No.1329 of 2012 Amar Singh State of M.P.& other 19.12.2012 Shri Gopal Singh, Counsel for the appellant.

Shri Vivek Agrawal, G.A.for the respondents.

This appeal is directed against an order dated 31.10.2012, by which a writ petition preferred by the petitioner against the rejection of the representation filed by the appellant in compliance of earlier order passed by the writ Court, was dismissed.

It was a second round of litigation.

Though learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is suffering from brain tumor and he is entitled to remain posted at his present place of posting but once the representation for ventilation of the grievances has been rejected by the competent authority, no further action is required.

In earlier round of litigation, the writ Court had not interfered in the transfer order but permitted the appellant to file representation before the competent authority.

not the competent authority has considered the representation and rejected the same and thereafter the order was challenged in the writ petition which has been dismissed in the impugned order.

In the impugned order, we do not find any error warranting our interference.

The petitioner after his joining at the transferred place may submit a fresh representation for his adjustment to a nearer place to Rewa to get his treatment properly.

In case of filing of such representation, the competent authority would consider the matter in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge vj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial