Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj Kumar Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Manoj Kumar Tiwari vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054547

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.a.no.967/2012 manot kumar tiwari the state of m.p.& others 19.12.2012 this matter has been taken up suo motu for correction of typographical errors in order dated 10.9.2012 in this appeal. in the quoted order of the single bench, in 1 st para in 1st line, 'the' has been typed twice, one 'the' be deleted. at page 2 of the order in 4th and 2nd lines from the bottom in place of 'jointed', word 'joined' be substituted. at page 3 of the order in 8th line from the top, in place of word 'joint', word 'join' be substituted. at page 3 of the order, in 3rd para in 4th line, in place of word 'appellant', word 'respondent' shall be substituted. at page 4 of the order, in 5th line from the top, in place of 'jointed', word 'joined' be substituted. at page 4 of the order, in 2nd para, in place of words 'material fact was', words 'material facts were' shall be substituted. the aforesaid corrections are carried out in the court itself. issue fresh copy of the order by the registry to the parties. with the aforesaid directions, this matter is finally disposed of. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge c.

Full Judgment

1 W.A.No.967/2012 Manot Kumar Tiwari The State of M.P.& others 19.12.2012 This matter has been taken up suo motu for correction of typographical errors in order dated 10.9.2012 in this appeal.

In the quoted order of the Single Bench, in 1 st para in 1st line, 'the' has been typed twice, one 'the' be deleted.

At page 2 of the order in 4th and 2nd lines from the bottom in place of 'jointed', word 'joined' be substituted.

At page 3 of the order in 8th line from the top, in place of word 'joint', word 'join' be substituted.

At page 3 of the order, in 3rd para in 4th line, in place of word 'appellant', word 'respondent' shall be substituted.

At page 4 of the order, in 5th line from the top, in place of 'jointed', word 'joined' be substituted.

At page 4 of the order, in 2nd para, in place of words 'material fact was', words 'material facts were' shall be substituted.

The aforesaid corrections are carried out in the Court itself.

Issue fresh copy of the order by the Registry to the parties.

With the aforesaid directions, this matter is finally disposed of.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge Judge C.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial