AfshanuddIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Afshanuddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 13, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054488

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1054488
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 13, 2012
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Afshanuddin

Advocate Shri. S.D.Khan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

cr.r.no.1474/2012 13.8.2012 shri s.d.khan, counsel for the applicant. shri pushraj singh, panel lawyer for the state. heard finally. applicant has filed this criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 of cr.p.c.to quash the order dated 13.6.2012 passed in s.t.no.278/2012 by the learned second additional sessions judge, chhindwara. it is submitted by the counsel applicant that, applicant who is the complainant has moved an application together with some photographs as evidence which shows witnesses moinuddin and saifuddin with the accused person. these photographs were not taken on record by the second a.s.j.on the ground that these kind of photographs could be prepared by trick photography. looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed in s.t.no.278/2012 dated 13.6.2012 by the learned second additional sessions judge, chhindwara is quashed. this revision is allowed. documents in the form of photographs are taken on record. complainant is also permitted to used these photographs at the time of evidence. with this direction this petition is disposed off. c.c.as per rules. (m.a.siddiqui) judge sb

Full Judgment

CR.R.No.1474/2012 13.8.2012 Shri S.D.Khan, Counsel for the applicant.

Shri Pushraj Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State.

Heard finally.

Applicant has filed this Criminal Revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C.to quash the order dated 13.6.2012 passed in S.T.No.278/2012 by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara.

It is submitted by the counsel applicant that, applicant who is the complainant has moved an application together with some photographs as evidence which shows witnesses Moinuddin and Saifuddin with the accused person.

These photographs were not taken on record by the Second A.S.J.on the ground that these kind of photographs could be prepared by trick photography.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed in S.T.No.278/2012 dated 13.6.2012 by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara is quashed.

This revision is allowed.

Documents in the form of photographs are taken on record.

Complainant is also permitted to used these photographs at the time of evidence.

With this direction this petition is disposed off.

C.C.as per rules.

(M.A.SIDDIQUI) JUDGE sb

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Afshanuddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Service Tax