Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Surendra Kumar Purwar Vs. Gopal Das Purwar

Surendra Kumar Purwar vs Gopal Das Purwar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054381

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendra Kumar Purwar

Advocate Shri. Nitin Agrawal

Respondent

Gopal Das Purwar

Advocate Shri. Anurag Tiwari

Excerpt

s.a.no.2191/2005 13.08.2012 shri nitin agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant. shri anurag tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent. today the case is listed to consider i.a.no.6925/2012, which is an application for urgent hearing filed by respondent/landlord. it is urged that decree under section 12(1)(f) of the m.p.accommodation control act and has been passed against the appellant, however, the appeal may be heard at an early date as per the directions of the hon'ble apex court. on the other hand, learned counsel for the appellant submits that earlier application for urgent hearing filed by the appellant has already been rejected on 7/12/2011, however, there is no occasion to allow this application. after hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, it reveals that the appeal is listed for final hearing but it could not come up for hearing. earlier the application for urgent hearing filed by the appellant has been rejected with an observation that the appeal is already listed for final hearing, however, orders are not necessary for allowing the application. as the matter could not have yet been heard, again this i.a.has been filed. in the considered opinion of this court where decree under section 12(1)(f) of m.p.accommodation control act has been passed, the case is required to be heard within six months by the appellate authority. considering the aforesaid, i.a.no.6925/2012 is allowed and list this appeal for final hearing on 4th september, 2012. (j.k.maheshwari) judge ts

Full Judgment

S.A.No.2191/2005 13.08.2012 Shri Nitin Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri Anurag Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent.

Today the case is listed to consider I.A.No.6925/2012, which is an application for urgent hearing filed by respondent/landlord.

It is urged that decree under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P.Accommodation Control Act and has been passed against the appellant, however, the appeal may be heard at an early date as per the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the appellant submits that earlier application for urgent hearing filed by the appellant has already been rejected on 7/12/2011, however, there is no occasion to allow this application.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, it reveals that the appeal is listed for final hearing but it could not come up for hearing.

Earlier the application for urgent hearing filed by the appellant has been rejected with an observation that the appeal is already listed for final hearing, however, orders are not necessary for allowing the application.

As the matter could not have yet been heard, again this I.A.has been filed.

In the considered opinion of this Court where decree under Section 12(1)(f) of M.P.Accommodation Control Act has been passed, the case is required to be heard within six months by the appellate authority.

Considering the aforesaid, I.A.No.6925/2012 is allowed and list this appeal for final hearing on 4th September, 2012.

(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ts

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial