Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nanhe Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Nanhe vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054374

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nanhe

Advocate Shri. S.S.Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.6862/2012 13/08/2012 shri s.s.tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant. shri a.k.singh, learned g.a.for the respondent/state. heard finally. this is the firs.bail application filed by applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c for grant of bail. the applicant has been arrested on 23/02/12 in connection with crime no.39/2012 registered at p.s.udaipura, district raisen for the offence punishable under sections 294, 307 and 302/34 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. it is further submitted that a counter case is also registered against the complainant party alongwith the deceased shiv narayan as crime no.38/2012 under sections 451, 294, 323 and 506/34 of ipc. it is submitted that during the incident applicant assaulted the deceased in his self defence. trial would take considerable time to dispose of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. i have perused the case diary wherein it is specifically alleged that this applicant nanhe assaulted the deceased shiv @ shiv narayan by the back portion of an axe on his head. it reveals from the postmortem report that applicant sustained the fracture on his head and he succumbed to the aforesaid injury. in these circumstances, applicant is the main accused of the case therefore, i am not inclined to released him on bail. accordingly, this application filed u/s 439 of cr.p.c.for grant of bail is hereby dismissed. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.6862/2012 13/08/2012 Shri S.S.Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri A.K.Singh, learned G.A.for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 23/02/12 in connection with Crime No.39/2012 registered at P.S.Udaipura, District Raisen for the offence punishable under sections 294, 307 and 302/34 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

It is further submitted that a counter case is also registered against the complainant party alongwith the deceased Shiv Narayan as crime no.38/2012 under sections 451, 294, 323 and 506/34 of IPC.

It is submitted that during the incident applicant assaulted the deceased in his self defence.

Trial would take considerable time to dispose of finally therefore, he prays for bail to the applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.

I have perused the case diary wherein it is specifically alleged that this applicant Nanhe assaulted the deceased Shiv @ Shiv Narayan by the back portion of an axe on his head.

It reveals from the postmortem report that applicant sustained the fracture on his head and he succumbed to the aforesaid injury.

In these circumstances, applicant is the main accused of the case therefore, I am not inclined to released him on bail.

Accordingly, this application filed u/s 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail is hereby dismissed.

(G.S.SOLANKI) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial