Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radhavallabh Vs. Rameshwardayal

Radhavallabh vs Rameshwardayal

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 18, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054166

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radhavallabh

Advocate Shri. R.P.Khare

Respondent

Rameshwardayal

Excerpt

writ petition no.16120/12 18.10.2012 shri r.p.khare, learned counsel for the petitioners.he is heard on the question of admission. the petitioner has filed this petition under article 227 of the constitution of india, for quashment of the order dated 7.5.2012 (annexure- p-5) passed by sub-divisional officer (revenue) bairasia, district bhopal in revenue appeal no.78/appeal/2010-11, affirming the order dated 15.7.2011 (annexure-p-4) passed by tahsildar in revenue case no.48/a-6/2010-2011 whereby, the name of the respondents no.1 to 3, had been directed to be mutated in the revenue record with respect of the disputed land. such order has been passed on the strength of some succession certificate issued by the succession court on dated 6.1.1983 (annexure-p-3).in the cours.of arguments in view of provision of section 44 of madhya pradesh land revenue code in which the second appeal is provided against the order passed by the sdo in the firs.appeal of the revenue case so also in view of provision of sections 383 and 384 of indian succession act, on making certain query from the petitioners’ counsel regarding maintainability of this petition on which, instead to argue further he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file the second appeal before the commissioner of revenue bhopal division against the impugned order annexure-p-5 so also to file the appropriate application before the competent court for revocation of the aforesaid succession certificate (annexure-p-3) or to file an appeal in this regard under section 384 of succession act along with the appropriate application for condoning the delay in filing such proceedings. considering the aforesaid prayer, the petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with all the liberties as prayed by the petitioners’ counsel. certified copy as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge pb

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.16120/12 18.10.2012 Shri R.P.Khare, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.He is heard on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for quashment of the order dated 7.5.2012 (Annexure- P-5) passed by Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bairasia, District Bhopal in revenue appeal No.78/Appeal/2010-11, affirming the order dated 15.7.2011 (Annexure-P-4) passed by Tahsildar in revenue case No.48/A-6/2010-2011 whereby, the name of the respondents no.1 to 3, had been directed to be mutated in the revenue record with respect of the disputed land.

Such order has been passed on the strength of some succession certificate issued by the Succession Court on dated 6.1.1983 (Annexure-P-3).In the couRs.of arguments in view of provision of Section 44 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code in which the Second Appeal is provided against the order passed by the SDO in the fiRs.appeal of the revenue case so also in view of provision of Sections 383 and 384 of Indian Succession Act, on making certain query from the petitioners’ counsel regarding maintainability of this petition on which, instead to argue further he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file the Second Appeal before the Commissioner of Revenue Bhopal Division against the impugned order Annexure-P-5 so also to file the appropriate application before the competent Court for revocation of the aforesaid succession certificate (Annexure-P-3) or to file an appeal in this regard under Section 384 of Succession Act along with the appropriate application for condoning the delay in filing such proceedings.

Considering the aforesaid prayer, the petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with all the liberties as prayed by the petitioners’ counsel.

Certified copy as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge Pb

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial