Protyush Chattarjee Vs. Super Auto Forge Private Ltd.

Protyush Chattarjee vs Super Auto Forge Private Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 18, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054143

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1054143
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 18, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Protyush Chattarjee

Advocate Shri. Ajay Sharma

Respondent

Super Auto Forge Private Ltd.

Excerpt

m.c.c.no.1050/201”18. 10.2012 shri ajay sharma, learned counsel for the applicant. heard on i.a.no.11794/2012, application under section 5 of the limitation act for condoning the delay in filing m.c.c.for restoration of revision petition, dismissed in default. considering the averments made in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. the delay in filing the m.c.c.is condoned. m.c.c.itself is heard on admission. it is contended that the defaults pointed out by the registry were not cured on account of inadvertent mistake and since there was non-compliance of this order, subsequently the peremptory order was passed by this court. however, since the defaults could not be removed on account of peremptory order passed by this court on 13.07.2012, the review petition of the petitioner was dismissed. such averments made in the application are again supported by an affidavit. considering the aforesaid, the m.c.c.is allowed. review petition no.432/2012 is restored to its original number. since it is stated that the defaults have been removed, let the review petition be listed for admission after its restoration. the m.c.c.is accordingly disposed of. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

M.C.C.No.1050/201”

18. 10.2012 Shri Ajay Sharma, learned Counsel for the applicant.

Heard on I.A.No.11794/2012, application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing M.C.C.for restoration of revision petition, dismissed in default.

Considering the averments made in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed.

The delay in filing the M.C.C.is condoned.

M.C.C.itself is heard on admission.

It is contended that the defaults pointed out by the Registry were not cured on account of inadvertent mistake and since there was non-compliance of this order, subsequently the peremptory order was passed by this Court.

However, since the defaults could not be removed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 13.07.2012, the review petition of the petitioner was dismissed.

Such averments made in the application are again supported by an affidavit.

Considering the aforesaid, the M.C.C.is allowed.

Review Petition No.432/2012 is restored to its original number.

Since it is stated that the defaults have been removed, let the review petition be listed for admission after its restoration.

The M.C.C.is accordingly disposed of.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Protyush Chattarjee vs Super Auto Forge Private Ltd. Same Subject Education