Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandrika Soni Vs. Pullar Soni

Chandrika Soni vs Pullar Soni

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 18, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054133

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandrika Soni

Advocate Shri. A.P.Shah

Respondent

Pullar Soni

Excerpt

writ petition no.16172/12 18.10.2012 shri a.p.shah, learned counsel for the petitioner. having heard on the question of admission, it is directed that on payment of p.f.along with requisite of the registered post within three working days, the notice against admission as well as of i.a.no.12626/12, an application for grant of stay, returnable by fixing a date within six weeks be issued to the respondents failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the bench. as an interim measure till next hearing of this petition, the parties are directed to maintain the status-quo with all aspects as it exists today. certified copy as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge pb

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.16172/12 18.10.2012 Shri A.P.Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Having heard on the question of admission, it is directed that on payment of P.F.along with requisite of the registered post within three working days, the notice against admission as well as of I.A.No.12626/12, an application for grant of stay, returnable by fixing a date within six weeks be issued to the respondents failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench.

As an interim measure till next hearing of this petition, the parties are directed to maintain the status-quo with all aspects as it exists today.

Certified copy as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge Pb

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial