Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Firoz HussaIn Vs. Faqruddin

Firoz Hussain vs Faqruddin

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 27, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054097

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Firoz Hussain

Advocate Shri. R.D.Hundikar

Respondent

Faqruddin

Excerpt

w.p.no.13891 o”27. 09.12 shri r.d.hundikar, counsel for the petitioner. heard on the question of admission. keeping in view the available circumstances, in which after marking the exhibit p/3, on the alleged impugned document of memorandum regarding partition in the deposition of plaintiff witness no.1 recorded on dated 23.6.09, the impugned order dated 10.7.12 annex.p/1, has been passed whereby the aforesaid document annex.p/3 has been impounded, without expressing any opinion at this stage, it is directed that on payment of pf along with requisites of the registered post within three working days,notices against admission of this petition as well as on ia no.11118/12 an application for grant of stay against further proceedings of the trial court, returnable within six weeks, be issued to the respondents, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the bench. as an interim measure, till next hearing of this petition, the further proceedings of the impugned civil suit no.1-a/12 pending in the court of i civil judge-ii, burhanpur, is hereby stayed. let this matter be listed on the date so fixed in the aforesaid notices. c.c as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge mkl

Full Judgment

W.P.No.13891 o”

27. 09.12 Shri R.D.Hundikar, counsel for the petitioner.

Heard on the question of admission.

Keeping in view the available circumstances, in which after marking the exhibit P/3, on the alleged impugned document of memorandum regarding partition in the deposition of plaintiff witness No.1 recorded on dated 23.6.09, the impugned order dated 10.7.12 Annex.P/1, has been passed whereby the aforesaid document Annex.P/3 has been impounded, without expressing any opinion at this stage, it is directed that on payment of PF along with requisites of the registered post within three working days,notices against admission of this petition as well as on IA No.11118/12 an application for grant of stay against further proceedings of the trial court, returnable within six weeks, be issued to the respondents, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the bench.

As an interim measure, till next hearing of this petition, the further proceedings of the impugned Civil suit No.1-A/12 pending in the court of I Civil Judge-II, Burhanpur, is hereby stayed.

Let this matter be listed on the date so fixed in the aforesaid notices.

C.C as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge MKL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial