Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

SalauddIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Salauddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Sep 27, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054086

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Salauddin

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

cr.a.no.1339 o”27. 09.12 ku anita kaithwas, counsel for the appellants. smt nirmala nayak, ga for the respondent /state. in compliance of the earlier order, state counsel submits that on verification from the concerning jail it is found that appellants no.1 and 2 are still facing the awarded jail sentence of this case. such statement is taken o n record. heard on i.a.no.14186/12, a repeat application on behalf of appellants no.1 and 2, namely,salauddin and anwar alias khachhak for suspension of their jail sentence and grant of bail. their earlier application in this regard was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 2.2.2012. after holding conviction for the offence under section 379/34 of the ipc, each of them have been directed to undergo for ri 3 years.as per record they suffered the judicial custody from the date of arrest 20.11.2009 till passing the impugned judgment on dated 12.5.2011 and since then they are facing the awarded jail sentence. in such premises they have suffered near about 2 years and 8 months out of the awarded jail sentence. having heard, considering the over-all circumstances of the matter so also keeping in view that these appellants have already suffered near about 2 years and 8 months out of the awarded jail sentence of 3 years.without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the ia is allowed and remaining jail sentence of the appellants is hereby suspended. it is further directed that on furnishing a personal bond of rs.20,000/- (rs.twenty thousand) by appellants with one surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial court, appellants no.1 and 2 namely, salauddin and anwar alias khachhak shall be released on bail with a further direction to remain present in the registry of this court firstly on 27.11.2012 and on such other dates as fixed by the office in this regard till disposal of this appeal. c.c.as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge mkl

Full Judgment

Cr.A.No.1339 o”

27. 09.12 Ku Anita Kaithwas, counsel for the appellants.

Smt Nirmala Nayak, GA for the respondent /State.

In compliance of the earlier order, state counsel submits that on verification from the concerning jail it is found that appellants No.1 and 2 are still facing the awarded jail sentence of this case.

Such statement is taken o n record.

Heard on I.A.No.14186/12, a repeat application on behalf of appellants No.1 and 2, namely,Salauddin and Anwar alias Khachhak for suspension of their jail sentence and grant of bail.

Their earlier application in this regard was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 2.2.2012.

After holding conviction for the offence under Section 379/34 of the IPC, each of them have been directed to undergo for RI 3 yeaRs.As per record they suffered the judicial custody from the date of arrest 20.11.2009 till passing the impugned judgment on dated 12.5.2011 and since then they are facing the awarded jail sentence.

In such premises they have suffered near about 2 years and 8 months out of the awarded jail sentence.

Having heard, considering the over-all circumstances of the matter so also keeping in view that these appellants have already suffered near about 2 years and 8 months out of the awarded jail sentence of 3 yeaRs.without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the IA is allowed and remaining jail sentence of the appellants is hereby suspended.

It is further directed that on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.twenty thousand) by appellants with one surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, appellants No.1 and 2 namely, Salauddin and Anwar alias Khachhak shall be released on bail with a further direction to remain present in the Registry of this Court firstly on 27.11.2012 and on such other dates as fixed by the office in this regard till disposal of this appeal.

C.C.as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge MKL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial