Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Reference Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

In Reference vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 22, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1054003

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Reference

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

conc. 381/2013 22.02.2013 shri p.k.kaurav, learned additional advocate general, for the state of m.p.it is submitted by shri kaurav that he may be allowed four weeks time to seek instructions in respect of compliance of the order dated 04.12.2012 in special leave to appeal (civil) no.38280/2012. it is also prayed by him that he may be served with necessary documents by the registry so that the order may be complied with before the next date of hearing. in view of the aforesaid, office is directed to serve complete set of petition to shri kaurav within three working days so that he may take necessary steps for compliance of the order. in case, the order is not complied with, appropriate proceedings shall be initiated against the officers.who were party in the matter. be listed for hearing on 08.04.2013. (krishn kumar lahoti) (m.a.siddiqui) judge judge psm

Full Judgment

CONC.

381/2013 22.02.2013 Shri P.K.Kaurav, learned Additional Advocate General, for the State of M.P.It is submitted by Shri Kaurav that he may be allowed four weeks time to seek instructions in respect of compliance of the order dated 04.12.2012 in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.38280/2012.

It is also prayed by him that he may be served with necessary documents by the Registry so that the order may be complied with before the next date of hearing.

In view of the aforesaid, office is directed to serve complete set of petition to Shri Kaurav within three working days so that he may take necessary steps for compliance of the order.

In case, the order is not complied with, appropriate proceedings shall be initiated against the officeRs.who were party in the matter.

Be listed for hearing on 08.04.2013.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Judge Judge psm

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties In Reference vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales